Thank you for reading D.C. Witness. Help us continue our mission into 2024.Donate Now
During an Oct. 20 hearing, DC Superior Court Judge Milton Lee heard arguments regarding a motion to suppress identifications of the defendant.
During the hearing, defense attorney Nikki Lotze argued for the suppression of identifications from witnesses. She said the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) only used one photo rather than a spread for identification, so there is a large likelihood of misidentification in this case.
She argued that it is possible witnesses were heavily suggested to identify the defendant as the shooter on the basis of there only being one photo of him.
The prosecution refuted this motion to suppress the witnesses’ identifications, arguing that because the witnesses had prior contact and relationship with Elhadji, it is much more likely they were able to correctly identify him.
While he acknowledged the defense’s photo spread concern, Judge Lee denied the motion to suppress the identifications on the basis of the defendant’s prior interaction and familiarity with the witnesses who identified him.
The trial is set to begin on April 21, 2023.Follow this case