Judge Releases Homicide Defendant Despite Witnesses Worried for Their Safety

Thank you for reading D.C. Witness. Help us continue our mission into 2024.

On Dec. 19, DC Superior Court Judge Anthony Epstein released a homicide defendant from DC Jail, despite prosecutor’s sharing witnesses’ written statements opposing it.

Jose Ramos, 36, is charged with second-degree murder while armed for his alleged involvement in the fatal beating of 58-year-old Eduardo Cruz on Jan. 25, 2022, on the 3700 block of Georgia Avenue, NW.

Rachel McCoy, Ramos’ defense attorney, motioned for Judge Epstein to release Ramos, arguing he has ample support in the community, has a job opportunity in construction, and can remain in home confinement otherwise.

Prosecutors opposed the request, arguing Ramos remains a danger to the community. They read statements from two witnesses, which stated their strong opposition to his release. Both mentioned their safety concerns, specifically stating they worry about retaliation if Ramos is released.

“I can hear the victim’s pleas for help to this day,” said one of the statements read in court. “I believe Ramos would be vengeful,” it continued.

The other witness stated they have had to completely restart their lives in that they don’t feel safe anywhere and feel the need to always be aware of their surroundings.

A representative from the Pretrial Services Agency (PSA) alerted Judge Epstein that the agency found Ramos eligible for release, stating they would follow any conditions that the judge implements.

Judge Epstein granted the motion for release, stating that Ramos has been enrolled in programs at the jail, and they have changed his security level from maximum to medium security. He argued he believed there were a combination of conditions that can ensure the safety of the community, and ensure Ramos’ success in his pretrial release.

He released Ramos to home confinement, with GPS monitoring and that he needs mandatory permission to leave for work. He’s also required to drug test, receive treatment if necessary, and stay away from the incident location and witnesses.

Parties are expected back for a trial readiness hearing on Aug. 2, 2024.

Follow this case