Defense Accuses Prosecution Of Ethical Breach in Shooting Case

By Caitlin Blackman [former] - August 21, 2024
Daily Stories | Non-Fatal Shooting | Shooting | Suspects |

Defense counsel in a non-fatal shooting case accused prosecutors of unethical conduct during a hearing on Aug. 20 before DC Superior Court Judge Errol Arthur. 

Amonte Moody, 18, is charged with endangerment with a firearm and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence for his alleged involvement in a shooting on April 22 on the 1700 block of Independence Avenue, SE. No injuries were reported. 

During the hearing, Judge Arthur confirmed a plea offer previously made to Moody was rejected in a hearing before DC Superior Court Judge Rainey Brandt on Aug. 12. 

However, defense attorneys Kavya Naini and Molly Bunke stated that Moody did not understand the offer making it difficult to reach an informed decision.

Naini claimed the prosecution lied about what indictment charges Moody would face if he chose to reject the plea. According to Naini, in a phone conversation, the prosecution informed her that they would not seek indictment for assault with intent to kill. 

However, Moody was indicted on the charge. Given the apparent contradiction Naini argues that the prosecution engaged in unethical behavior and should not argue the case.

The prosecution didn’t respond to the allegations. 

Naini and Bunke also raised issues about the timely manner disclosure of evidence as well as the notice for expert witnesses. Judge Arthur informed parties he would not rule on these matters and would leave them to the trial judge DC Superior Court Judge Anthony Epstein.

Parties requested the felony arraignment be continued and are scheduled to reconvene on Aug. 23.