Is a Homicide Defendant Mentally Competent? Defense Says No

Thank you for reading D.C. Witness.
Consider making a donation to help us continue our mission.

Donate Now

A homicide defendant’s attorney argued against a mental competency finding before DC Superior Court Judge Jason Park in a hearing on April 1.

Darryl Thompon, 35, also known as Darryl Tompkins, is charged two counts of first-degree murder while armed, assault with intent to kill while armed, three counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, three counts of unlawful possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, three counts of carrying a pistol without a license, obstruction of justice, and threats to kidnap or injure a person.

These charges stem from his alleged involvement in the death of Edward Roberts Jr., 29 who was shot on July 30, 2016, on the 3500 block of 14th Street, NW. Thompson is also charged in the fatal shooting of Tyler McEachern, 23, on Aug. 29, 2016, on the 3100 block of Buena Vista Terrace, SE.

Relying on a medical assessment, the prosecution stated Thompson is competent and chooses not to consult with his attorneys. They also say Thompson did not reveal any signs of personality or delusional disorder prior to the 2016 incidents.

Thompson’s defense attorney, Dana D. Page, presented evidence supporting the opposite conclusion, namely that five experts believe Thompson is incompetent, meaning he is unable to understand the charges against him and participate in his defense.

Citing the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5-R) which is a description of known mental illnesses used by therapists, she said Thompson exhibited a history of disorganized statements and writing and delusional thinking.

Page further complained Thompson wasn’t properly interviewed by psychiatrists, and the court failed to come up with a treatment plan after requiring the patient take medication.

In response, the prosecution said a board certified specialist spent about two hours talking to Thompson before finding him competent and no treatment plan was proposed. .

Judge Park took the matter under submission and will alert the parties when he reaches a ruling.