Search Icon Search site

Search

Non-fatal Shooting Co-Defendant Wins Extended Curfew 

DC Superior Court Judge Neal Kravitz granted a non-fatal shooting co-defendant an extension on his curfew on Nov. 14

Donte Bennett, 27 and Demarco Hayes, 22, are charged with assault with intent to kill while armed, two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon, aggravated assault knowingly while armed, carrying a pistol without a license outside a home or business, and four counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence,. These charges stem from a non-fatal shooting that took place on the 1800 block of Marion Barry Avenue, SE, on July 24, 2024.

Hayes is also charged with unlawful possession of ammunition and possession of an unregistered firearm in connection to the matter. 

At the hearing, Hayes’ defense attorney, Molly Bunke, stated that Hayes had recently been hired by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), and would begin working a 6 a. m.-to-2 p. m. shifts starting Nov. 17.

Currently, Hayes and Bennett are both under GPS monitoring with a curfew from 10 p. m.-to-6 a. m. 

Bunke requested that Judge Kravitz be open to granting an extension of his current curfew for confirmed employment opportunities, rather than modifying Hayes’ current curfew altogether.

Judge Kravitz congratulated Hayes on his employment, and said that Hayes’ hours outside of his home would be extended for confirmed employment opportunities. 

Bunke also orally requested that Hayes’ GPS monitor be removed, and that according to the Pretrial Services Agency (PSA), Hayes has been in “perfect compliance”. Bunke added that Hayes no longer is required to complete weekly drug tests, and has been downgraded to spot testing. 

Judge Kratviz denied the motion without prejudice, given that there was no written motion and that Hayes currently has a stay-away order in place. Judge Kravitz told Bunke that he would be potentially open to reconsideration if a motion was formally filed. 

Parties are slated to reconvene Feb. 13. 2026.

Domestic Homicide Defendant Jail Until Trial

DC Superior Court Judge Jason Park found probable cause to hold a homicide defendant in his girlfriend’s fatal shooting on Nov. 20.


Darryan Bynum, 32, is charged with second-degree murder while armed in connection with his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 36-year-old Mignon Brown-Massey on Aug. 13, 2025, on the 3300 block of 15th Street, NE.

During the hearing, prosecutors called to the stand a detective from the Metropolitan Police Department’s (MPD) Homicide Branch who testified about his interactions with Bynum on Aug. 13, 2023, identified him in court, and discussed the preparation of the affidavit.

Prosecutors presented a series of video exhibits to the court. The first showed interior footage from the living room of the residence where the shooting occurred. Additional street view footage allegedly captured Bynum leaving the home with another individual at approximately 3:02 a. m. 

The prosecutor showed another video of Bynum entering a room and demanding, “Who the f*** are you?” to a witness. A subsequent clip, time-stamped 3:04 a. m., depicted him entering a bedroom, while a later video from 3:29 a. m. appeared to show someone exiting the bedroom and entering the bathroom.

The prosecution also played the 911 call, during which Bynum could be heard crying and pleading for help, stating that his girlfriend had been shot outside. The emotional recording prompted members of the victim’s family to leave the courtroom in tears.

During cross-examination, defense attorney Kevin O’Sullivan highlighted the longstanding romantic relationship between Bynum and Brown-Massey. He emphasized that the couple lived together and had no known history of domestic violence. 

O’Sullivan noted that there were no reports, witnesses, or video evidence indicating arguments, threats, or abusive behavior between them. Several witnesses corroborated this, describing Brown-Massey as intoxicated but calm on the night in question and reporting no signs of conflict.

A friend of the victim testified that he had fallen asleep in the bedroom with Brown-Massey and that no sexual activity had taken place. He recounted that Bynum became upset upon discovering them, and claimed that Bynum pointed a gun at him and struck him. 

The defense challenged these assertions, pointing out the lack of medical documentation or video evidence of injuries and noting that the friend admitted to possessing a firearm of his own. O’Sullivan further stressed that no one witnessed what occurred inside the bedroom at the exact moment the shot was fired, and that investigators found no shell casings in the home.

Although a gun was later located allegedly in Bynum’s Jeep with a lodged bullet, the defense argued there was no physical evidence linking that weapon to the shooting. A projectile recovered from the bathroom was still undergoing testing. The defense also remarked that Brown-Massey survived until noon the next day and did not make a 911 call herself.

Arguing that the prosecution had failed to establish probable cause, O’Sullivan emphasized the absence of video capturing the shooting, the lack of eyewitnesses, and the uncertain connection between the weapon recovered and the fatal injury. 

He portrayed Brown-Massey’s friend as unreliable due to inconsistencies in his statements and his admission of carrying a gun. The defense maintained that the shooting was accidental and occurred in the heat of the moment after Bynum discovered another man in bed with his girlfriend. They argued that Bynum’s actions afterward, attempting to care for Brown-Massey and eventually calling 911, reflected panic rather than intent.

The judge, however, rejected the defense’s arguments. Citing the surveillance footage showing Bynum entering the bedroom followed by a sound consistent with a gunshot, as well as later images of Brown-Massey crawling toward the bathroom, the judge found the evidence consistent with the cause of death. 

The court did not accept the defense’s claim of an accidental shooting, noting the delayed 911 call and testimony that Bynum appeared upset. With probable cause established, the hearing proceeded to arguments regarding detention.

Prosecutors urged the court to keep Bynum detained, characterizing the case as a domestic-violence homicide that took place inside the home. They stressed that Bynum waited hours before seeking help, that Brown-Massey died roughly an hour after arriving at the hospital, and that Bynum was already on probation in Maryland under conditions prohibiting new offenses or firearm possession. They argued that Bynum violated these terms and posed a danger to the community.

The defense countered with a request for Bynum’s release on electronic monitoring to his mother’s home. O’Sullivan emphasized Bynum’s lack of prior criminal history, steady employment, educational background, and strong family support.

He noted that Bynum helps care for his sick mother, works long hours, runs a small apparel business, and is a first-time father with Brown-Massey’s child. The defense argued that the shooting involved a single, unintentional event and that Bynum believed the injury was minor. They contended that prosecutors could not show that lesser conditions of release would be inadequate.

The judge ordered that Bynum remain detained, expressing concern that he allegedly committed the offense while already on release and under explicit orders not to possess a firearm.

Parties are slated to reconvene on Feb. 26, 2026.

Stabbing Defendant Pleads Guilty After Sentencing Questions

A stabbing defendant accepted a plea deal after resolving questions about sentencing in a hearing before DC Superior Court Judge Neal Kravitz on Nov. 14.

Sequon Price, 30, was originally charged with assault with intent to kill while armed and aggravated assault knowingly while armed for his involvement in a non-fatal stabbing that wounded one individual at the intersection of Wheeler Road and Alabama Avenue, SE, on July 15.

During the hearing, Judge Kravitz asked about the plea offer to Price, which would have him plead guilty to assault with a dangerous weapon and attempted possession with the intent to distribute. In exchange, the prosecution would agree not to seek an indictment against the defendant. 

When asked about the status of the plea, defense attorney Madalyn Harvey noted that she wanted to amend the offer before Price accepted it. She explained that, according to the prosecution, the current language in the plea offer would prevent Price from requesting to reduce his sentence in a motion. Harvey said that Price was not willing to accept the plea deal if he could not file a post-conviction motion to reduce his sentence.

Judge Kravitz told the defense that “no objective reader” of the plea agreement would think the defendant was waiving his right to motion for a reduced sentence, and that any argument to the contrary by the prosecution was “not a credible argument.”

The prosecution stated that the plea offer would not prevent the motion and requested that she call her supervisor to clarify the language confusion, explaining that she and her supervisors may have misunderstood Harvey’s initial email regarding the motion.

When parties returned, the prosecution explained that there had been “several miscommunications,” and that Price accepting the plea offer would not prevent him from a sentence reduction motion.

Price accepted the plea offer, saying that he “had reacted without thinking” when he stabbed the victim, and that it was no excuse.

On Price’s behalf, Harvey asked if he could be released on GPS monitoring before his sentencing hearing, noting that he had “taken responsibility” by pleading guilty early, and had a “minimal record.”

The prosecution opposed his release, noting the nature of the offense and the significance of the victim’s injuries, as they had been stabbed in the face.

Judge Kravitz ordered that Price continue to be held.

Parties are set to reconvene on Feb. 6.

Shooting Defendant Re-Sentenced For Probation Noncompliance

A shooting defendant was re-sentenced to ten months of incarceration by DC Superior Court Milton Lee for probation noncompliance on Nov. 13.

On June 6, 2023, Be’Shon Tyler, 24, pleaded guilty to attempted assault with a dangerous weapon for his involvement in a shooting that occurred on the 100 block of Irvington Street, SW on May 9, 2023. 

He was originally sentenced to 24 months in prison, with 12 suspended, 18 months of probation, and three years supervised release on Nov. 6, 2023.

Tyler’s probation was revoked on Oct. 20, due to noncompliance in light of a new misdemeanor charge.

Judge Lee noted that Tyler was set for trial in a new misdemeanor case in January and asked if Peter Cooper, Tyler’s attorney, wished to go forward with the sentencing for this shooting after that trial. After speaking with his client, Cooper informed the court that Tyler wanted to continue with sentencing.

Prosecution requested Tyler serve the 12 months that were originally suspended from his sentence. The prosecutor highlighted that probation did not go well with Tyler. There were only marginal, if any, improvements between each hearing, and this eventually resulted in the misdemeanor charge. They also noted that Tyler had ample notice and warnings about the consequences of not complying with probation conditions.

Cooper told the court that probation showed good and bad indicators from Tyler. Although a bad sign was the misdemeanor charge, Cooper noted how probation gave Tyler the time to understand the importance of living harmoniously as a member of society.

Tyler also spoke about how probation allowed him to see himself as a real man with a real job for the first time. 

Judge Lee mentioned he had warned Tyler multiple times, telling him that he was the only person who could help himself. Judge Lee said he wanted to help, and did not want Tyler to grow older, just to look back at himself and question why he spent his youth incarcerated.

Tyler was re-sentenced to ten months incarceration, and 30 days supervised release.

Parties are not slated to reconvene.

Homicide Defense Says Late Grand Jury Testimony Amounts to ‘Egregious’ Misconduct

DC Superior Court Judge Todd Edelman is considering a fair way to proceed with a homicide case while near decade old grand jury transcripts are reviewed on Nov. 20.

Oscar Diaz-Romero, 47, is charged with two counts of second-degree murder for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of Jose Noel Coreas-Carcaro, 22, and Jose Molina, 27, on the 2400 block of 18th Street, NW, on Aug. 9, 1997.

The prosecution discovered 19 boxes of files including 1997 grand jury testimony in the case. The prosecution explained that copies in their office had been destroyed, and rediscovered elsewhere but the company had originally claimed they did not have the files. He told Judge Edelman that he is in the process of trying to get any other computer files from the original prosecutor.

There were 13 witnesses in the grand jury, which ended Sept. 10, 1997. The prosecution originally planned to call two of those witnesses during the trial. However, these transcripts contain possible Brady violations requiring disclosure of potentially exculpatory information that needed to be disclosed to the defense team ahead of trial.

A witness the prosecution was not intending to call provided a description of the shooter that contradicts the description provided by other witnesses and does not match the defendant. 

Another witness directly contradicted the testimony of a key prosecution witness, a driver who claimed that the prosecution’s witness was also wearing a sports jersey that the shooter is described to be wearing by other witnesses.

The defense team, Julie Swaney and Destiny Fullwood-Singh, told the judge they do not know enough about these witnesses. Swaney  asked that the prosecution help the defense investigation by providing any and all contact information for them. She also believed there is no fair solution to this case other than dismissal due to the “egregious” misconduct of the prosecution. 

Judge Edelman said that “the case was not ready for trial on the trial date” and believes the case would have been a “potential disaster” had they proceeded. However, he was unsure about a remedy. The judge said that dismissal would only be appropriate if it is impossible to give Diaz-Romero a fair trial or sanction the prosecution for misconduct.

Swaney argued that the late disclosure cost them ten months to look into these witnesses, who may be able to aid the defense’s case. 

The defense team will file a supplement to their Brady motion by Dec. 1 to provide more details about the alleged violations they have found within the transcripts. After this submission and the prosecution’s response, a motion to dismiss may be appropriate.

Judge Edelman asked the parties to remain in touch with him to avoid future surprises.

Parties are slated to return Dec. 18.

Document: MPD Arrests Suspect in Northeast Shooting

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) announced the arrest of 44-year-old Thomas Jamal Carter in connection with a shooting incident on Sept. 24 on Rhode Island Avenue, NE. Carter, who has no fixed address, was charged with Assault with a Dangerous Weapon (Gun) and Probation Violation. The investigation is ongoing.

Stabbing Defendant Transferred to Mental Hospital For Competency Restoration

DC Superior Court Deborah Israel ordered Saint Elizabeths Hospital to attempt a mental competency restoration for a stabbing defendant on Nov. 20.

Leon Bryant, 35, is charged with assault with intent to commit robbery while armed for his alleged involvement in a stabbing that occurred on Sept. 8, 2025 on the 1700 block of Lincoln Rd, NE, leaving one person injured. 

A competency evaluation by the Department of Behavioral Health (DBH) determined Bryant to be incompetent to stand trial, and requested he undergo restoration. Judge Israel ordered Bryant transferred to the psychiatric facility for observation and testing.

In order to stand trial, a defendant must understand the charges against him and help his lawyer defend the case.

Parties are slated to reconvene on Jan. 13.

Document: MPD Makes Arrest in Southeast Stabbing

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) announced the arrest of 44-year-old Tekesia Atiya Hancock in connection with a stabbing incident that occurred on Sept. 29 on the 2400 block of Marion Barry Avenue, SE. The victim, an adult female, was hospitalized with non-life-threatening injuries. Hancock has been charged with Assault with a Dangerous Weapon (Knife).

Facts of Carjacking ‘Hotly Contested’ at Sentencing

DC Superior Court Judge Judith Pipe described the facts of a co-defendant carjacking case as “hotly contested” during a sentencing on Nov. 14. 

Kevin Lester, 37, and Traviyan Hardy, 24, pleaded guilty on Sept. 8 to robbery and unauthorized use of a vehicle for their involvement in a carjacking on June 13 on the 3900 block of Benning Road, NE.

According to court documents, Hardy was in the passenger seat of the victim’s vehicle when Lester approached the vehicle, pulled the victim to the ground, and assaulted him. Lester and Hardy then robbed the victim and drove away in his vehicle. 

At sentencing, Judge Pipe described the facts of the case as “hotly contested.” Lester’s attorney, Theodore Shaw, and Hardy’s attorney, Everald Thompson, asserted that the victim sexually assaulted Hardy while she was in his vehicle and Hardy contacted Lester for assistance because she was uncomfortable.

Shaw claimed a defense investigation corroborated Hardy’s version of events and showed parties text messages between Hardy and Lester during the incident. 

Judge Pipe said the messages aligned with Hardy’s initial interview with the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) in which she told officers the victim offered to pay her for sex. Judge Pipe also noted that the victim was 71 while Hardy appeared to be a healthy 24-year-old.

Thompson believed Hardy was credible and said she did not originally disclose the assault to MPD because she was uncomfortable and doubted she would be taken seriously.

The prosecutor said the judge should not credit Hardy’s description of the incident because the objective evidence did not indicate sexual assault. According to the prosecutor, Hardy’s statements were not truthful but made in a “self-serving manner” to mitigate the sentence she received. 

The prosecutor noted Hardy lacked a criminal history which weighed in her favor but requested she serve a top-of-the-guideline sentence of 60 months of imprisonment for robbery and 28 months for unauthorized use of a vehicle. The prosecution did not oppose concurrent sentences.

Thompson asked Judge Pipe to sentence Hardy under the Youth Rehabilitation Act (YRA), which allows people under 25 who are convicted of certain crimes to have their convictions sealed or cleared after they successfully complete their sentence and potentially offers sentencing flexibility for the defendant. The prosecutor opposed the application of the YRA to Hardy’s sentence. 

Thompson requested Hardy serve a split sentence with all time suspended but one year of imprisonment for robbery and six months for unauthorized use of a vehicle. 

Regarding Lester, the prosecutor requested a 66 month prison sentence for robbery concurrent with 28 months for unauthorized use of a vehicle. The prosecutor noted Lester had multiple prior convictions including a felony.

The prosecutor said he believed the victim did not deserve the violent assault from Lester.

Shaw requested Lester serve 48 months of imprisonment concurrently for each charge. Shaw noted Lester’s acceptance of responsibility in the case through the plea deal and described him as “deeply remorseful” for his actions. 

“[Lester’s] need to want to protect [Hardy] caused him to exercise some bad judgement,” said Shaw.

Shaw added that Lester was exposed to trauma throughout his life. According to Shaw, Lester’s mother was abused by her boyfriend, he was in the foster care system, and lacked stability his entire life.

First, Judge Pipe denied Hardy’s request for a YRA sentence. Judge Pipe then sentenced Hardy to 24 months of imprisonment for robbery and 24 months for unauthorized use of a vehicle. 

Lester was sentenced to 54 months for robbery and 28 months for unauthorized use of a vehicle. The sentences for both defendants will run concurrently followed by three years of supervised release.

No further dates were set.

Shooting Defendant’s Hearing Delayed by New DC Jail Stabbing Charge

DC Superior Court Judge Michael Ryan delayed a hearing on Nov. 14 after the defense reported newly filed stabbing charges against the defendant.

Rodney Bennett, 20, is charged with two counts of endangerment with a firearm offenses committed during release, 21 counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence offenses committed during release, five counts of robbery while armed offenses committed during release, three counts of possession of an unregistered firearm offenses committed during release, eight counts of assault with a dangerous weapon offenses committed during release, three counts of unlawful possession of ammunition offenses committed during release, four counts of assault with intention to kill offenses committed during release, five counts of unauthorized use of a vehicle offenses committed during release, first degree theft offenses committed during release, robbery offenses committed during release, and three counts of carrying a pistol without a license outside a home/business offenses committed during release.

These charges stem from his alleged involvement in a non-fatal shooting that occurred on Aug. 28, 2024 on the 600 block of Edgewood Street, NE. No injuries were sustained.

During the brief proceeding, defense attorney Michael Madden informed Judge Ryan that Bennett had been charged two days earlier in a separate felony matter.

According to court records, Bennett is charged with assault with a dangerous weapon for his alleged involvement in a stabbing on Nov. 12 at the DC Jail on the 1900 block of D Street, SE. One individual sustained injuries.

The stabbing occurred outside a jail cell. Bennett was allegedly engaged in a verbal dispute with another inmate when he allegedly assaulted and struck the inmate with a homemade shank. The stabbing caused lacerations, stab wounds, an abrasion and bruises to the victim’s head, neck and upper body. 

Citing this new case, Madden requested that the status hearing be continued to allow the defense additional time to assess the recent charge and its potential impact on the current proceedings. The prosecution agreed to the continuance, noting that it was not yet clear whether the prosecution would move to indict Bennett. Judge Ryan granted the request.  

The parties are slated to reconvene on Jan. 16, 2026.

Judge Denies Self-Representation Bid in DC Jail Stabbing Case

DC Superior Court Judge Michael Ryan denied a stabbing defendant’s motion to represent himself on Nov. 14, after struggling to demonstrate a basic understanding of how a criminal trial works.

Ovid Gabriel, 20, is charged with assault with intent to kill while armed and assault on a police officer for his alleged involvement in a stabbing at the DC Jail on Aug. 3. An officer was injured during the incident.

According to documents issued by the court, Gabriel allegedly stabbed the officer nine times after the officer had ordered him into his cell.

Gabriel filed a motion to represent himself after claiming dissatisfaction with his current attorney, Raymond Jones. The defendant said he mailed the motion to the court a week earlier. 

Judge Ryan claimed he had not received it, prompting Gabriel to provide the court with a physical copy. The motion was reviewed by the prosecution and Jones, and then, the judge. 

The prosecution noted it had no objection to Gabriel representing himself, citing his self-representation in another case. 

Judge Ryan questioned Gabriel extensively to determine whether he had the capacity to represent himself in a criminal trial. Gabriel informed the court he had a high school diploma, identified himself as an entrepreneur in tattoos and fine arts, did not use drugs or medication, and understood the charges and possible penalties. He said he had been studying case law for six months but could not recall specific cases when asked. 

Judge Ryan pressed Gabriel on his practical understanding of trial procedures, asking him what a jury determines, what evidence is presented in a criminal trial, how to proceed if a witness does not appear, and how cross-examination works. Gabriel was unable to provide correct or confident answers, telling the court he still had “a lot to learn.” 

The judge emphasized that his concerns were professional rather than personal, explaining that he believed Gabriel lacked the fundamental knowledge needed to represent himself in a criminal trial. He warned Gabriel not to rely on advice from other detainees about self-representation.

Although Gabriel did not dispute the judge’s assessment, he reiterated that he was not comfortable continuing with Jones as his counsel. Judge Ryan replied that self-representation and dissatisfaction with counsel were two “different issues.” 

Gabriel then withdrew his motion to represent himself. The judge granted the withdrawal, and Gabriel submitted a new motion requesting new counsel. Judge Ryan approved the request. 

The prosecution outlined the procedural history of the case, noting that it originated as a less serious felony matter before Gabriel was later charged in a separate and more serious case.

They said the overlapping cases had left the current matter pending for several months. The prosecution also told the court that the prosecutors had extended a plea offer in August, which the defense initially considered. 

The plea offer, which expired at the close of the hearing, required Gabriel to plead guilty to aggravated assault while armed and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, in exchange for dismissal of all remaining charges and the prosecution not seeking an indictment. The prosecution described the expiration as a “fork in the road” and said no future offer would be more favorable. 

Jones confirmed he had discussed the plea with Gabriel, which Gabriel also acknowledged. Judge Ryan then questioned Gabriel to ensure he was knowingly rejecting the offer. 

Gabriel claimed he did not recall seeing body-worn camera footage, though Jones attempted to jog his memory.

Gabriel stated he did not want to plead guilty, effectively rejecting the plea offer. 

The parties are slated to reconvene on Nov. 18.

Document: MPD Arrests Suspect in Elvans Road Homicide

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) announced the arrest of 27-year-old Corey Noble, alleged suspect in the fatal shooting of Tre’von Norman, 25, on March 20 on the 2400 block of Elvans Road, SE. Noble has been charged with First-Degree Murder while Armed-Felony Murder.

Workplace Shooting Defendant Receives Partially Suspended Sentence  

DC Superior Court Judge Todd Edelman sentenced a defendant involved in a workplace dispute shooting to 60 months in prison, with all but 36 suspended, during a Nov. 14 hearing. 

On Sept. 12, Michael Alexander, 20, pleaded guilty to aggravated assault and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence for his involvement in a non-fatal shooting on the 300 block of S Street, NE, on Feb. 21. 

According to court documents, Alexander’s co-worker sustained superficial wounds to his left ear after Alexander shot him during an argument about a delivery order. 

During the Nov. 14 hearing, the prosecution asked Judge Edelman to sentence Alexander to five years in prison. They argued that the defendant shot at the victim’s head and “narrowly missed a homicide,” which should be reflected in the length of his sentence. 

The prosecution argued that the defendant should not be considered under the Youth Rehabilitation Act (YRA), which allows for young defendants’ convictions to be sealed if they successfully complete sentencing requirements. The prosecution argued that the severity of Alexander’s offense makes the the YRA an inappropriate remedy.

Defense attorney Albert Amissah argued that Alexander falls squarely under the YRA and advocated for straight probation. Amissah explained that Alexander was just 19-years-old when he committed the crime and that his age should make rehabilitation the sole focus of the court. 

Amissah asked the court to consider Alexander’s past experiences. He was robbed and attacked in prison, but has had little contact with the criminal justice system. He also has a record of mental health issues and attended school for children with disabilities. 

Amissah argued that the victim was the aggressor of the dispute, explaining that the victim chased Alexander across the street. Amissah argued that Alexander felt scared and reacted poorly as a result.  

He shared that Alexander has a daughter who was born while Alexander was in jail. Alexander has reflected on the pain he has caused his family and wants to avoid being an absent parent like his father.

Judge Edelman sentenced Alexander to 60 months in prison, with all but 36 suspended, and three years of supervised release. Alexander was sentenced under the YRA as well. 

Judge Edelam agreed with the defense that Alexander should be considered under the YRA because of his young age and the immaturity reflected in the crime. Alexander also demonstrated a strong potential to change– he has participated in programming in the DC Jail and has a long work history supported by several letters of recommendation from co-workers. 

Jude Edelman recognized that Alexander pleaded guilty before being indicted for the crime and agreed with the defense that Alexander had no significant history with the criminal justice system. 

However, Judge Edelman explained that a probationary sentencing would be inappropriate for the crime committed. As he saw it, the workplace violence resulted in Alexander shooting a single bullet at the victim’s head. While the victim provoked what happened, he never assaulted or touched Alexander.

Parties are not slated to reconvene. 

Document: MPD Arrests Suspect in Fatal Hit and Run Crash

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) announced the arrest of 32-year-old Jalen McLendon, alleged to be involved in a fatal hit-and-run crash. The incident occurred on Aug. 31, 2024, when a vehicle fleeing a traffic stop struck and killed 25-year-old Alpha Oumar Kake, who was riding a moped in Washington, D.C. McLendon has been charged with Second-Degree Murder while Armed.

Stabbing Defendant Pleads Not Guilty at Arraignment

A stabbing defendant pleaded not guilty to all charges before DC Superior Court Judge Michael Ryan on Nov. 12.

Osmin Ulises Vanegas Alvarez, 29, is charged with assault with intent to kill while armed, aggravated assault knowingly while armed, and possession of a prohibited weapon, for his alleged involvement in a non-fatal stabbing on Dec. 29, 2024, at an apartment complex located on the 1400 block of New York Avenue, NE. 

According to court documents, Vanegas Alvarez and the victim were reportedly involved in a dispute inside the building before the defendant allegedly followed him to the second floor and stabbed him inside a cleaning room. The victim sustained lacerations to the left tricep, left side of the chest, and left side of the neck.

During the hearing, Molly Bunke, Vanegas Alvarez’s attorney, alerted the court of his intent to plead not guilty, and  asserted his right to a speedy trial.

Parties are scheduled to reconvene on Jan. 7, 2026.