Search Icon Search site

Search

Homicide Defendant Plans to Withdraw Guilty Plea 

On Nov. 9, DC Superior Court Judge Rainey Brandt discussed a homicide defendant’s wish to withdraw a guilty plea with parties. 

Niko Hall, 32, was originally charged with first-degree murder while armed, two counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, assault with intent to kill while armed, and carrying a pistol without a license, for his involvement in the fatal shooting of 25-year-old Anthony Lee on Sept. 26, 2020, on the 2900 block of Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, SE. 

On Oct. 3, in what was supposed to be the beginning of his trial, Hall accepted a plea offer that required he plead guilty to second-degree murder while armed in exchange for a dismissal of all other charges.

On Oct. 23, Judge Brandt received a report from Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (CSOSA) which stated that, during his pre-sentencing report interview, Hall was not interested in participating because he wants to withdraw his guilty plea. 

Marnitta King, Hall’s defense attorney, alerted the court she had met with Hall to discuss the request, and had found out the CSOSA claims were true. She also alerted the court she is in the midst of drafting a motion to withdraw the plea. 

Judge Brandt stated that, under Rule 11, a judge may grant the defendant’s request to withdraw a guilty plea if they prove a “fair and just reason” for their request. 

King will file a motion by Nov. 20, and the prosecutors will respond by Dec. 8. 

Judge Brandt vacated his Nov. 27 sentencing hearing, and scheduled a motions hearing for Dec. 14. 

Case Acquitted: ‘Use Your Common Sense’ Prosecutors State, as Parties Deliver Closing Arguments in 2020 Homicide Case

This case was acquitted on Nov. 15, 2023.

On Nov. 8, parties provided closing statements for a 2020 homicide case in front of DC Superior Court Judge Anthony Epstein

Michael Austin, 29, is charged with first-degree murder while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and unlawful possession of a firearm by a convict, for his alleged involvement in the murder of 26-year-old Kayvon Kinney on May 24, 2020, on the 1800 block of Gainesville Street, SE.

Starting their closing arguments, prosecutors told the jury, “We’re asking you to use your common sense about what happened in this case”. 

Prosecutors displayed a video of the argument between Austin and Kinney, where an unidentified person can be heard stating, “Mikey, no! Stop.” They argued the video footage, along with the testimony of multiple witnesses, were the key pieces of evidence in this case. 

Displaying another video, prosecutors showed Austin arriving at a retirement home where his mother worked, alleging she was helping him in the aftermath of the shooting. Prosecutors narrated the video, displaying Austin leaving the building while his mom exited a different way as she went to unlock her car. 

Prosecutors alleged Austin’s mom was attempting to hide the license plate of the car from cameras by angling it away from them. They also argued she appeared to conceal a firearm in a plastic bag before getting back into the car.

Austin’s defense attorney, Jason Tulley, argued there is a complete lack of evidence showing that Austin was the shooter. 

According to Tulley,  eyewitness testimony described the shooter as wearing “blue jean shorts, not wearing a hat, had a short fade, and was clean shaven”. Tulley displayed a picture of Austin at the time of the incident and explained that Austin had a beard, glasses, and hair that did not resemble a fade.

Tulley also emphasized that the investigation was poorly conducted by the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), specifically emphasizing  that Austin was arrested before any description of the shooter was actually given to detectives. 

According to Tulley, “leads were ignored, and not followed.” He stated that eyewitnesses of the shooting were not found until four months after the incident, with one individual found by accident two years later, whose description didn’t match Austin’s physical appearance. 

Tulley argued that the video showing Austin running to his car after the gunshots does not make him guilty, insisting he was attempting to flee for his own safety. 

Lastly, Tulley described the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network (NIBIN) report that was given to detectives during the investigation,  which stated that there was a “significant potential that the firearm used in this shooting was involved in another shooting,” which is alleged to have occurred after Kinney’s death. According to Tulley, the report indicated the probability was substantial and “an investigation is warranted”.

Despite the information received in the NIBIN report, detectives failed to investigate the lead any further, even though Austin was known to be nowhere near the second incident that potentially involved the same gun. 

Tulley advised the jury, “Don’t be fooled,” claiming that Austin left the scene because there was a shooting and there is no evidence that actually places Austin in the back parking lot, where the shooting occurred. 

Tulley requested the jury find Austin not guilty of all charges. 

During their rebuttal, prosecutors argued a witness had testified the shooter appeared to be left-handed, and remarked that Austin had been writing with his left hand for the entirety of the trial, and signed MPD documents with his left hand during his interviews. 

In reference to the defense’s argument that Austin’s mom was an alcoholic and was concealing alcohol in her car rather than a gun, prosecutors argued the defense was, “throwing her under the bus”. 

Prosecution also pointed out that surveillance footage displays Austin’s mom wearing a mask and gloves after her son arrives, which she wasn’t wearing previously. Prosecutors argued this would correlate to her wrapping up a gun rather than concealing alcohol. 

Closing their argument, prosecutors stated “Kinney, at the age of 26, was shot eight times for an argument”.

The jury has started their deliberations and are expected to continue for the next few days.

Witness Could Face Deportation in a Murder Trial

At a Nov. 8 status hearing before DC Superior Court Judge Maribeth Raffinan prosecutors and defense attorneys sparred about whether a murder witness facing deportation can testify in a deposition.

Oscar Ramos, 34, is charged with first-degree murder while armed, two counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and assault with intent to kill while armed, for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 50-year-old Pedro Alvarado on  May 28, 2015, on Interstate 295 North at exit one, SW. The incident left another individual suffering from non-life-threatening injuries. 

Ramos was indicted on Sept. 30, 2021, six years after the shooting occurred and arrested on April 20, 2022. 

According to court documents, the prosecution filed a motion on Nov. 2 to allow a witness to give a deposition at trial on March 18, 2024.  The sworn statement would be in lieu of an in person appearance.

The prosecution stated in the motion that they want the witness’s testimony since the individual was inside Alvarado’s car, which was allegedly shot at multiple times by Ramos. 

According to prosecutors, the witness’ testimony is important because he will detail statements allegedly made by Ramos during the shooting as well as seeing Ramos destroy evidence about the shooting sometime after the shooting happened. 

When the witness was served with a subpoena by prosecutors, a United States Immigration Judge ordered that the person deported since he is not a U.S. citizen. The ruling was affirmed on appeal.

Prosecutors argued in the motion that there is not a DC Court of Appeals precedent that addresses a witness’s likely deportation or eventual removal from the U.S. before a trial; therefore, a pretrial deposition would be “in the interest of justice.”

The witness, who had been held by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), is now being held by the DC Department of Corrections, on an order requiring the person to testify in the trial. 

The prosecution stated that when the U.S. Marshal Service initiated the transfer of custody, the witness was already held in the custody of ICE, and was scheduled to be put back on a flight to their country of origin.

DC law permits a material witness to testify in a deposition if further detention isn’t necessary “to prevent failure of justice.”

According to the prosecution, if the witness is released, the U.S. Marshal Service is compelled to return him to ICE, who will remove him from the country. They also argued that, if released, it is “substantially likely he won’t appear” in the trial. 

Camille Wagner, Ramos’ defense attorney, stated they will file an opposition to the prosecutor’s motion by Nov. 9 

Judge Raffinan scheduled a hearing to address the motions. 

Parties will reconvene Nov. 17. 

Domestic Violence Expert Testifies in 2014 Homicide Trial

On Nov. 8, the prosecution called a domestic violence expert to testify in a homicide trial before DC Superior Court Judge Michael O’Keefe.

Marvin Lopez, 43, is charged with premeditated first-degree murder and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 27-year-old Evelyn Arroyo on Dec. 24, 2014, on the 3900 block of 14th street, NW. 

According to the witness, domestic violence occurs when one partner harms the other using physical violence, aggression, or emotional and psychological abuse. She further explained that coercive control is used by a perpetrator to commit these acts of violence. 

According to the witness, the tactics are “intimidation, isolation, manipulation, micro-regulation, degradation, deprivation, surveillance, and sexual coercion”. The witness further stated that most abusive relationships are continuous, characterized by an act of violence, followed by apologies and remorse. 

The prosecution asked about victims being arrested as a result of striking back against their abusers. The witness said that in many cases, the victim will strike first if they believe they are in danger, and it is likely that the victim will be arrested.

Additionally, the prosecution questioned the expert regarding common myths about domestic violence. The witness explained that a common myth is that the abuse comes to an end if the victim were to leave the relationship. She said it is actually the opposite, and that in most cases, the abuse escalates as a result of the victim leaving the relationship. 

During cross-examination, Marvin Lopez’s defense attorney, Justin Okezie, asked, “You’re not testifying about [Lopez] at all, right? You have never met him?”, to which the witness replied she has never met Lopez.

The witness then reemphasized that she has not reviewed any evidence in this case, and is testifying based on her overall knowledge of domestic violence. Okezie argued that the witness therefore could not state if Lopez had ever used any method of coercive control against Arroyo.

When asked if perpetrators of domestic violence can be females, the witness stated that there are women who commit violence against men, but that it is less likely. 

“What about a woman pulling out a knife, unprovoked. Is this abuse?”, said Okezie, in reference to a previous incident between Lopez and Arroyo where Arroyo is alleged to have taken out a knife. The witness replied that she would need more facts about the case to make a determination, to which Okezie replied, “Is this justified because she’s a woman?”

The witness then reiterated that she would need more information to make any conclusions.

Okezie also questioned the credibility of domestic violence research, arguing that “You don’t have an actual scientific way to define it, do you?”, in reference to research on coercive control.

The witness replied she does have a scientific method, but said she would need more context and information about the specific case to make any determinations. 

According to Okezie, what the witness was saying was “completely abstract”, and “there are so many things that people do in their daily lives that fall into controlling behavior”.

During redirect, the prosecution responded to the defense’s question about the hypothetical knife incident. The prosecution asked if one moment in time was enough to make a judgment of a relationship, to which the witness replied that it was not.

Parties are expected to reconvene Nov. 9.

Judge Considers Murder Evidence in Preliminary Hearing

On Nov. 8, DC Superior Court Judge Rainey Brandt heard evidence to determine if a homicide case could move to trial. 

Iesha Marks, 29, is charged with first-degree murder while armed for her alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 46-year-old Donald Childs on July 23 on the 100 block of Farragut Street, NW.

The prosecution called the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) lead detective, who identified Marks as the suspect. 

The detective explained that before the shooting occurred, there was a dispute in an alleyway near the intersection of Farragut Street, NW, and New Hampshire, NW. This resulted in an individual, who he identified as Marks, entering a black Toyota Camry passenger side and the car driving away. 

According to the detective, about 20 minutes later, the car came back, and the person on the passenger side stuck their hand out and fatally shot Childs. The detective’s explanation was backed by surveillance footage presented in court. 

According to the prosecution, probable cause is appropriate for Marks because, “she went to this alley for a planned fight”. 

Dana Page, Marks’ defense attorney, said he “came to the area to fight one woman,” when she was met by several other individuals in the alley.  

According to Page, the individuals in the alley, “were armed, and that’s a scary thing,” implying that they could’ve hurt Marks. Page said their alleged possession of a weapon is the reason Marks left the alley. 

According to Page, no one can be certain who shot the gun because the surveillance footage does not show the individual in the passenger seat. She also argued that, because Marks wasn’t the driver of the vehicle, she didn’t get to decide whether or not she wanted to remain in the area. 

Page argued Judge Brandt should not find probable cause because there’s no evidence that Marks was the aggressor. 

Judge Brandt said she handled an unrelated shooting case involving Marks in 2021, so she knows her background.  

Judge Brandt alerted the parties she needed additional time to review the evidence before making a ruling. 

Parties are scheduled to reconvene on Nov. 14. 

Three Individuals Arrested in Connection to 22 Incidents in October, Data Shows

D.C. Witness data shows that, in October, there were 18 homicide and eight non-fatal shooting victims, connected to 22 different incidents. 

All homicide victims’ deaths stemmed from a shooting. 

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), according to D.C. Witness records, arrested suspects in connection to three of the 22 incidents. 

One of the individuals, 46-year-old Desmond Thurston, is charged with second-degree murder while armed for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 52-year-old Patricia Johnson on Oct. 1, on the 400 block of 13th Street, SE. 

According to court documents, Thurston and Johnson had previously been in a relationship, during which Thurston had been accused of domestic violence on various occasions. On Oct. 1, Johnson sustained gunshot wounds to her hand, face, and her chest. 

A week later, 28-year-old Nathaniel Arce-Washington was arrested and charged with two counts of assault with intent to kill while armed and two counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, for his alleged involvement in a non-fatal shooting that occurred on Nov. 9 on the 1200 block of Queen Street, NE. The incident left two individuals suffering from life-threatening injuries. 

According to a Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) detective’s testimony, Arce-Washington was seen in a surveillance video allegedly shooting at men who “robbed and pistol whipped” him. Arce-Washington had a laceration above his right eye that was severely bleeding at the time of his arrest. 

Likewise, on Oct. 17, 33-year-old Ni’Jhae Curry was arrested and charged with assault with a dangerous weapon and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, for her alleged involvement in a non-fatal shooting on the 900 block of Sycamore Drive, SE. 

According to court documents, MPD arrived at the reported location after being dispatched due to gunshots. When police arrived they found a a woman stating Curry had fought with her and fired one round resulting from a dispute. Two witnesses attempted to aid the complainant and diffuse the fight. 

MPD offers a reward to anyone that provides information which leads to the arrest and conviction of anyone involved in a violent crime in the District. 

Prosecution Proceeds in March Stabbing Case Despite Death of A Witness

At a Nov. 8 felony status conference, prosecutors alerted DC Superior Court Judge Maribeth Raffinan that, despite a key witness’ death, they will continue to prosecute a homicide defendant. 

Garland T. Davis, 65, is charged with second-degree murder while armed for his alleged involvement in the March 9 fatal stabbing of Jonathan Craig, 34, on the 1600 block of 17th Place, SE. 

According to court documents, Craig was found unconscious and unresponsive with a stab wound to his neck. He succumbed to his injuries at the scene. Davis allegedly broke into an apartment through a back window and started an argument with Craig. When Craig asked Davis to leave, he pulled out a knife and stabbed the victim.

At the hearing, the prosecution told Judge Raffinan that on Nov. 7, they were notified that a key witness, who was supposed to testify in the trial died. However, they still intend to continue prosecuting Davis.

Kevin Mosley, Davis’ defense attorney, asked the prosecution if the witness ever testified before the grand jury before their death. The prosecution told Mosley that they would not disclose this information to the defense.

Mosley alerted the court he would file a motion regarding matter. 

Plea negotiations are underway and parties are expected to reconvene on Dec. 13.  

Homicide Case Delayed After Defendant’s Failure to Drug Test

At a status hearing on Nov. 8, DC Superior Court Judge Maribeth Raffinan continued the case of an April 2019 homicide defendant because he failed to appear for a court-ordered drug test.

Terrance Barnes, 33, is charged with first-degree murder while armed and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence for his alleged involvement in the death of 57-year-old Barry Holmes, on April 17, 2019. The incident occurred on the 5100 block of Southern Avenue, SE.

A representative for the Pretrial Services Agency (PSA) alerted Judge Raffinan that Barnes failed to appear for a drug test, which is a requirement of his release conditions. 

Judge Raffinan warned Barnes that if he continues to be non-compliant he could risk incarceration.

Pierce Suen, Barnes’ defense attorney, said there may have been some kind of confusion or mix-up with the PSA as to when he was supposed to show up on Nov. 6 for drug testing.

Suen said Barnes has reported 12 times in the past for drug testing, but Judge Raffinan said it will be addressed at the next hearing. 

Parties are expected back for a motions hearing on Nov. 28. 

Homicide Defendant’s Roommate and a Friend Testify in Homicide Trial

On Nov. 7, a homicide defendant’s brother and a friend testified about their knowledge of the case before DC Superior Court Judge Michael O’Keefe.

Marvin Lopez, 43, is charged with premeditated first-degree murder and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of his former girlfriend, 27-year-old Evelyn Arroyo on Dec. 24, 2014, on the 3900 block of 14th Street, NW. Lopez allegedly threatened her with death if she left him.

The prosecution began by calling Lopez’s and Arroyo’s roommate at the time of the murder back to the stand. 

According to the witness, Lopez had never mentioned moving out of their shared apartment, or moving back to El Salvador. She also testified that she had never seen him pack any of his belongings, saying the last time she saw Lopez was earlier the day of Arroyo’s murder.

The prosecution then called Lopez’s brother who said he was at a Christmas Eve party when he was informed of Arroyo’s death. However, Lopez was not there, and the brother didn’t see him at all that night.

The witness further testified that he saw Lopez in El Salvador in 2019 five years after the murder, for their aunt’s funeral. He described feeling “bad” about seeing Lopez at the event. 

During cross-examination Lopez’s defense attorney, Justin Okezie, asked if Lopez traveled to El Salvador frequently prior to the incident, to which the witness described that he did. 

Okezie said that, “in El Salvador, Christmas is a big, important holiday”, and that “it is not unusual for a Salvadorian with the resources and availability to travel to El Salvador for Christmas to be with their family”. 

Okezie also asked if the brother were close enough to Lopez to know his constant whereabouts. The witness replied he did not always Know Lopez’s whereabouts.

Then the prosecution called a former Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) detective assigned to locate and apprehend Lopez. According to the detective, he spoke to multiple family members who seemed scared to provide information.

According to the detective, a few months after the murder they were able to find a man with information that placed Lopez back in his home country of El Salvador. T

Parties will reconvene Nov. 8.

Uber Ride Violates Release Conditions in Non-Fatal Shooting

On Nov. 6, DC Superior Court Judge Maribeth Raffinan allowed a shooting defendant to remain on release following a technical compliance issue. 

Delvin Pollard, 29, is being charged with two counts of assault with intent to kill, among other charges, for his alleged involvement in a non-fatal shooting directed at two police officers inside a vehicle. The incident occurred at the 300 block of Hawaii Avenue, NE on Dec. 6, 2019. 

According to court documents, there were no injuries reported, but there were bullet fragments recovered from the vehicle. 

Pollard has been on release since Oct. 21, 2022. He is under high intensity supervision, which includes a condition that requires him to stay away from the location of the shooting. His curfew was lifted in May, though the other conditions remained in effect. 

According to Judge Raffinan, she received notice Pollard was in compliance with his release conditions with the exception of an incident in which, according to the defense, Pollard was traveling in an Uber to work and the driver passed through the location listed on his stay-away order. 

Judge Raffinan stated that she did not believe this issue required any action. Prosecution did not object. 

The next status hearing is set for Jan. 9. The trial is slated to begin May 13, 2024.

Jury Convicts Non-Fatal Shooting Defendant of Conspiracy

On Nov. 6, a jury found a defendant guilty of three charges in a 2023 non-fatal shooting before DC Superior Court Judge Sean Staples.

Tiaquana Chandler, 42, was convicted of conspiracy, aggravated assault while armed and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence for her involvement in a shooting that took place March 28, in an apartment on the 3400 block of 13th Place, SE. The incident left one individual suffering from a gunshot wound. 

Chandler was acquitted of first degree burglary, assault with significant bodily injury while armed, soliciting a violent crime and an additional possession of a firearm during a crime of violence charge.

During the trial two witnesses, including the victim, gave testimony identifying Chandler and her son, Donnell Tucker, 27, as those responsible for the shooting and assault.

According to the victim, there was an argument between him and Chandler. After leaving the apartment, she returned with Tucker and they assaulted and shot the victim. The victim said it was Tucker who shot him and the other witness said she saw Tucker with the weapon.

According to prosecutors, under the law, Chandler was an aider and abetter, and can be found guilty of the actions taken by the shooter. The prosecutor said, “She put a person with a gun in that position,” referring to Tucker.

Chandler’s defense attorney, Thomas Healy, discussed the different levels of proof needed to convict someone of a crime. According to Healy, “This is a conspiracy case without a conspiracy”.

The defense argued that prosecutors did not provide enough evidence to prove that Chandler committed these crimes, “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

Chandler will remain on release as she awaits sentencing which is scheduled for Jan. 12.

Judge Denies Release Request for Non-Fatal Shooting Defendant During Presentments

At a Nov. 6 presentment hearing, DC Superior Court Judge Judith Pipe denied a defendant’s request for release. 

Marquez Beasley, 31, is charged with assault with a dangerous weapon and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence for his alleged involvement in a non-fatal shooting on the 900th Block of Division Avenue, NE on Aug. 16. There were three individuals with reported injuries.

According to court documents, the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) arrived at the location after being dispatched due to multiple gunshots. The shooting allegedly occurred after a dispute related to a car accident in which Beasley was involved. He allegedly shot at two of the individuals after they attempted to exchange information with him. The third victim was a bystander. 

Judge Pipe found probable cause following prosecution’s argument that the complainants identified Beasley as the shooter.  

Beasley’s defense attorney, John Machado, orally motioned for Beasley to be released as he awaits further proceedings. 

Judge Pipe denied the defense’s request for release, deeming Beasley a danger to the community. 

Parties are expected back for a preliminary hearing on Nov. 9. 

Alleged Juvenile Carjacker Sent to Psychiatric Hospital

On Nov. 6, following a forensic evaluation by doctors at the court’s Urgent Care Clinic, DC Superior Court Judge Andrea Hertzfeld ordered a juvenile be detained at a psychiatric hospital in the District.

The juvenile is charged in connection to a carjacking that ended in the death of 13-year-old Vernard Toney Jr., on Oct. 28, on the 600 block of D Street, NW.

According to a Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) press release, the two juveniles were allegedly attempting to carjack an off-duty security officer. The officer was carrying a legally owned firearm, and shot Toney Jr. The defendant is alleged to have fled the scene. 

During the Nov. 6 hearing, the juvenile’s defense attorney alerted Judge Hertzfeld that his client is still in the intake center at the Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services (DYRS) and has been bullied by 17- and 18-year-olds. The defense attorney requested Judge Hertzfeld order DYRS to make sure the juvenile is safe. 

He also requested the juvenile be released to his mother, who, the defense attorney argued is diligent, can supervise him and keep a “strict, watchful eye” on the child, insisting that his detention at the DYRS’ Youth Services Center (YSC) puts him at risk. According to the defense attorney, the juvenile has been at the intake center since his arrest on Oct. 31. 

A representative for the court’s Social Services recommended the defendant remain detained until he’s evaluated. The defendant allegedly defecated on the shower floor and smeared the feces throughout the facility. Social Services argued the juvenile’s outbursts pose a safety risk to others in the YSC. 

Judge Hertzfeld ordered an emergency forensic evaluation of the boy’s mental status. A doctor at the court’s Urgent Care Clinic recommended the juvenile be hospitalized due to their clinical findings. 

In response, Judge Hertzfeld also ordered the juvenile be held under DYRS custody at a psychiatric facility in the District and undergo tests, mental evaluations, and personal and group therapy for 21 days. Previously, the defendant was diagnosed with mental health complications and prescribed medication, however he refused to take it.

The judge reminded the juvenile he must cooperate with doctors and other staff at the hospital to ensure his case moves forward. 

Judge Hertzfield said she will also appoint a Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) or mentor for the juvenile. 

In addition, she ordered the juvenile be transported to the hospital on Nov. 6, telling the defense attorney to reach out to her if DYRS fails to act accordingly. 

“Excuse me, can I give him a hug,” asked the juvenile’s mother as he was escorted out of the courtroom. Her request was denied by the judge, who stated that is not allowed. 

Parties are expected back on Nov. 20 for a status hearing. 

Case Acquitted: Judge Says Detective’s Conflicting Testimony in Homicide Trial Is ‘Concerning’

This case was acquitted on Nov. 15, 2023.

On Nov. 6, DC Superior Court Judge Anthony Epstein said a detective’s apparently contradictory testimony in a murder trial is “concerning.”

Michael Austin, 28, is charged with first-degree murder while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and unlawful possession of a firearm by a convict, for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 26-year-old Kayvon Kinney in a parking lot near an apartment complex on the 1800 block of Gainesville Street, SE, on May 24, 2020. 

Defense attorney, Jason Tulley, argued the lead Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) detective had an eyewitness’s phone number “on day two” of the investigation, yet did not interview him until roughly four months later.

The detective agreed–however, he said he had no contact information for the witness during Austin’s preliminary hearing in September 2020.

“Your initial testimony was not correct,” said Tulley given the detective’s previous claim that there were no eyewitnesses.  The detective didn’t elaborate saying only he gave a different version to the grand jury.

“His testimony at the preliminary hearing is concerning,” said Judge Epstein in relation to the apparent change from the detective’s earlier account.

Tulley also questioned the detective’s account of one witness’s testimony and said another witness was turned up by accident.

According to the defense, there were fingerprints found near the incident, as well as an individual who was reportedly near the scene wearing a GPS ordered monitor. The detective did not follow up on either lead.

Meanwhile, the detective said shell casings recovered from this incident were a potential match to another incident in July 2021 where Austin was not a suspect.

The detective also said there was no forensic testing done on the shell casings, but he said in the grand jury hearing that testing was done and it was inconclusive–another apparent contradiction.

Another detective from the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) continued his testimony from Nov. 2. 

According to the detective, he recovered text messages and internet search history from Austin’s girlfriend’s phone. The search history contained phases like “shooting on Gainesville Street” from soon after Kinney’s murder.

During cross-examination, the detective testified that he did not see a photo of what Austin was wearing the day of the incident, and the defense argued that he did not follow-up on surveillance video of a black vehicle leaving the scene soon after the shooting.

A deputy medical examiner testified Kinney died from “several fatal wounds”

Before resting their case, the prosecution called a graphics specialist from the U.S. Attorney’s Office who confirmed surveillance clips depict a group gathered in the front of the crime scene. A few seconds later, gunshots are heard, and a car leaves. In another clip, a vehicle a similar vehicle arrives at Austin’s mother’s complex. 

The lead detective’s testimony will continue on Nov 7.

2021 Domestic Violence Defendant Requests Another Competency Screening

On Nov. 7, a mental observation hearing was held before DC Superior Court Judge Lynn Leibovitz to consider whether a domestic violence defendant should get a new doctor to determine if he’s competent to stand trial.

Kevin Settles, 36, is charged with one count of armed carjacking, assault on a police officer while armed, assault with a dangerous weapon, unlawful possession of ammunition, attempted unarmed carjacking, possession of an unregistered firearm, unlawful discharge of a firearm, carrying a pistol outside a home or business, unlawful possession of a firearm, and four counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, for his alleged involvement in a domestic violence shooting that occurred on the 100 block of Ridge Road, SE, on Feb. 23, 2021. No one was injured in the shooting. 

According to court documents, Settles was in the passenger seat of a vehicle when he became agitated and allegedly pointed a firearm at his girlfriend, telling her to exit the car. Settles allegedly ran down the street and shot into the air multiple times, eventually entering the driver’s seat of a Metropolitan Police Department’s (MPD) truancy van before being disarmed by officers.

Settles’ defense attorney, Brian McDaniel, requested that Settles receive another mental evaluation because he says the previous doctor wrote an incomplete report.

Judge Leibovitz said she could approve a voucher for expert services on the issue of competency, but needed approval from supervisors before making a final decision given the additional cost.

Parties are expected to reconvene Feb. 6 to further discuss Settles’ mental observation results.