Homicide Defendant Pleads Not Guilty During Arraignment

On Jan. 31, a homicide defendant pleaded not guilty during his arraignment before DC Superior Court Judge Marisa Demeo.

Ravon Slye, 31, is charged with second-degree murder while armed for allegedly stabbing his girlfriend, 30-year-old Andrea Bond, on March 7, 2023, on the 1100 Block of D Street, NE.

According to court documents, the defendant had a history of domestic violence and was on probation at the time of the incident. Moreover, the victim’s family had reportedly expressed apprehension about Slye’s being around Bond.

Kevin Mosley, Slye’s defense attorney, informed the court that he pleaded not guilty to the charge of second-degree murder while armed, and asserted his constitutional rights, including a speedy trial.

While awaiting trial, Slye will remain at the D.C. Jail.

A status hearing to discuss a trial date has been scheduled for February 14.

Defense Motions for Retrial of Seven-Year-Old Crime

Seven years after the murder of 17-year-old Jhamari Sydnor, Superior Court Judge Maribeth Raffinan addressed a motion filed by co-defendants for a retrial, on Jan. 31.

Robert Moses, 24, and James Mayfield, 24, were charged on several counts, including first-degree murder while armed, assault with intent to kill, conspiracy, and aggravated assault while armed, for their involvement in the fatal shooting of Sydnor. The shooting occurred on Aug. 10, 2017, at the intersection of Montana and Saratoga Avenues, NE. The incident left 3 other individuals injured.

The trial was put before a jury five years after the crime, resulting in a guilty verdict on Dec. 8, 2022.

Defense attorneys Veronica Holt and Steven Kiersh motioned for a retrial in July of 2023 arguing that the prosecution purposefully withheld crucial evidence.

According to statements from all parties, the prosecution only recently handed over a pre-trial interview with their main witness, It revealed the witness saw Mayfield and Moses in Edgewood around the time of the shooting, not in the area the individual later testified seeing them.

“They [prosecution] knew Edgewood was relevant,” Holt said. “I never got a chance to investigate this, and had I known this, I would have questioned the police investigation.”

Holt argued that this was an “attempt to conceal evidence” on the prosecution’s behalf. According to Holt, the prosecution had this information at the time of the preliminary hearing on Nov. 6, 2017, and chose not to hand it over.

“What’s even more disturbing is that the [prosecution] provided evidence in a court pleading contradictory to what they heard from [a witness],” Holt said.

Holt claimed that, because the prosecution held this evidence for several years without handing it over, their actions were intentional.

“It is clear the [prosecution] did not want us to have access to this information because they feared it,” Holt said.

Keirsh echoed a similar sentiment, arguing that the evidence regarding identification could have very well altered the outcome of the trial.

“That information could have been investigated,” Kiersh said. “And there is a very real possibility that the jury could have made a different decision.”

The prosecution responded by claiming that the evidence was so “vast” that they simply missed the interview in their files, forgetting to hand it over altogether.

“We are not disclosing that this wasn’t turned over during trial,” the prosecution explained. “We do detest any intentionality in suppressing it.”

The prosecution defined the defense’s claims as “hypotheticals,” and ones they believed would not have made a significant difference in the trial.

“It’s too speculative to say that it could have led to anything,” the prosecution said. “The [prosecution’s] argument was so strong that there was no reasonable probability that there would have been a different outcome at trial.”

The “layering” of several pieces of evidence, including DNA traces and other witness testimonies, according to the prosecution, is enough to conclude the defendants’ guilt. The additional evidence from this interview would have had no impact on their argument, the prosecution said.

“There simply is no reasonable probability that the evidence, even if it were presented, would undermine the confidence of the outcome,” the prosecution said.

Holt countered the prosecution’s argument by claiming they misinterpreted the interview, but that still does not excuse the fact that this evidence was never disclosed.

“There is nothing speculative or vague about what [the witness] was saying,” Holt countered. “The [prosecution] didn’t believe them and that doesn’t give them the right to withhold evidence.”

Keirsh also said one of the jurors allegedly lied on her questionnaire during the trial’s jury selection. It wasn’t until mid-trial that Mayfield told Holt that he remembered her from his neighborhood years ago.

“Had we known that this African American woman knew or heard about this case, we would have moved to strike her,” Kiersh said.

Ultimately, Holt closed by arguing that this trial was simply not fair toward either party and set a dangerous precedent for the future.

“This is not just about this case,” Holt said. “This is about the ethics of how we do things.”

The motion hearing was cut short due to time limitations. Parties are slated to return on May 31.

Document: MPD Investigating Traffic Crash That Killed Child

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) is investigating the death of a young pedestrian from injuries she sustained after being struck by a vehicle on Jan. 30 at the 2500 block of Pennsylvania Avenue, SE.

According to MPD documents, a vehicle was driving southbound through a parking lot at the location. At the same time, a young child began running across the parking lot. The child was struck as she ran into the path of the vehicle.

The child was transported to an area hospital, where, despite all lifesaving efforts, she succumbed to her injuries.

The driver of the vehicle remained on the scene, and is cooperating with MPD.

The victim was identified as 5-year-old Zyina Crump.

Anyone with information about the incident should call police.

Document: MPD Searching for a Vehicle in a Northwest Shooting

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) is seeking the public’s assistance in locating a suspect vehicle involved in a shooting on Jan. 30 at the intersection of Q Street and Connecticut Avenue, NW.

According to MPD documents, officers responded to the location for the report of a shooting. Upon arrival, they located an adult male inside a vehicle suffering from gunshot wounds. The victim was transported to a local hospital for treatment of life-threatening injuries.

The suspect’s vehicle was captured by surveillance footage.

MPD offers a reward to anyone that provides information which leads to the arrest and conviction of the person or persons responsible for each violent crime in the District.

Document: MPD Investigating Man’s Overnight Crime Spree, Leaving 1 Dead and 1 with Critical Injuries

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) is investigating an overnight crime spree in DC connected to one suspect.

According to MPD documents, on Jan. 29 on the 900 block of K Street, NW, the suspect approached an occupied vehicle while it was parked along the block. The suspect got inside the vehicle and shot at the male driver, then exited the vehicle. The suspect fled on foot from the scene. The victim is receiving treatment at a local hospital for life-threatening injuries.

A few hours later, the suspect attempted to carjack an individual driving a vehicle at the intersection of 5th and K Street, NE, but was unsuccessful. The victim fled the scene and called police.

A short time later, the suspect approached a man and a woman by their car on the 300 block of N Street, NE, and demanded their keys. The suspect then shot the man and fled the scene in the victim’s vehicle. The victim was transported to the hospital, where he died. He was identified as 35-year-old Alberto Vasquez Jr. His vehicle was later recovered in Prince George’s County, MD.

The suspect committed two additional carjackings in PG County. In the early hours of Jan. 30, while driving a carjacked vehicle on I-295 Northbound, the suspect began shooting at a MPD cruiser while it was driving near Exit 1. A round struck the cruiser, but the officer was not injured.

At that time, the suspect drove to the 7500 block of Annapolis Road in PG County, where he had an interaction with members of the New Carrolton Police Department, which led to an officer-involved shooting.

MPD continues to work with our regional law enforcement partners on this continuing investigation.

There is no ongoing threat to the community.

Document: MPD Searching for a Suspect in Shooting

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) is seeking the public’s assistance in identifying and locating a suspect involved in a shooting on Jan. 4 at the 1600 block of Butler Street, SE.

According to MPD documents, the victim was driving their vehicle at the location when the suspect shot at the vehicle, striking it. The victim did not report any injuries.

The suspect was captured by surveillance footage.

MPD offers a reward to anyone that provides information which leads to the arrest and conviction of the person or persons responsible for each violent crime in the District.

Judge Provides Terms of Release for Aged Homicide Defendant

On Jan. 30, parties appeared before DC Superior Court Judge Marisa Demeo to discuss release terms for a homicide defendant in light of his severe health conditions.

Steven Schwartz, 85, is charged with second-degree murder while armed for his alleged involvement in the fatal stabbing of his 81-year-old wife, Sharron Hilda Schwartz. The incident occurred in their residence on Dec. 10, 2023 on the 1300 block of Corcoran Street, NW.

According to documents from the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), officers responded to the location, where they located Sharron with stab wounds and Steven with self-inflicted wounds. Both were transported to a local hospital, where Sharron succumbed to her injuries.

The defendant appeared over WebEx, as he was bedridden and asleep due to his medical conditions.

The prosecution argued that since the defendant had “snapped over a very mundane reason” and suffers from erratic behavior and unpredictability; they were concerned about future attacks he might commit and needed the court to surveil him upon release.

The prosecution requested Schwartz be required to check in regularly with Pretrial services, follow through with his medical treatment, work with a social worker from the Department of Aging, attend group therapy and services, and receive psychiatric treatment from the Core Services Agency. They also requested that he is kept in home confinement with GPS monitoring.

Schwartz’s defense attorney, Kobie Flowers, argued that the terms of home confinement and GPS monitoring were overly restrictive, as the defendant could not walk, was not cognizant, and was too frail to keep a GPS monitor on his leg.

Judge Demeo then heard recommendations from Pretrial Services stating they do not know if Schwartz can handle GPS monitoring, and requested that he regularly sign releases so they could stay up to date with his treatment.

Then, Judge Demeo heard from the son of the homicide victim, and the step-son of the defendant. He stated that as Schwartz’s caretaker, GPS monitoring would place an undue burden on him because he would need to charge it and ensure that Schwartz did not try to take it off.

After hearing these recommendations for release conditions, Judge Demeo stated that since Schwartz is 85, bedridden, and unable to leave his residence, the only danger he posed was to his family members and caretakers. Because of this, she stated that GPS monitoring would be unnecessary and inappropriate, and would place even more of a burden on his family members.

The parties temporarily agreed to have Schwartz supervised by a special team, sign releases of information so Pretrial Services can stay up to date on his treatment, and receive mental health services when he is physically capable of attending them. Judge Demeo stated that she did not need to order physical medical treatment, as his treatment was ongoing.

Parties are slated to return for another felony status conference on February 16 to further discuss these conditions, and determine if Schwartz is alert enough to hear and understand them.

Parties Finish Closing Arguments in Homicide Trial

On Jan. 31, defense continued their closing statements and prosecution gave their rebuttal before DC Superior Court Judge Marisa Demeo in a multi-week homicide trial.

Vorreze Thomas, 25, and his uncle Delonta Stevenson, 28, are charged with conspiracy, first-degree murder while armed, and two counts of assault with intent to kill, among other charges, for their alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 32-year-old Terrance Allen. The incident occurred on Jan. 18, 2021, on the 3000 block of Stanton Road, SE, and left two other individuals suffering from gunshot wounds.

All three victims were found inside a vehicle at the scene.

Thomas’s defense attorney, Howard McEachern, began his closing statements by stating that although many of the prosecution’s witnesses had testified, only one of them identified Thomas as being the driver of the green Volvo at the crime scene. This witness was one of the surviving victims of the shooting, who prosecutors claim is the individual they were attempting to kill.

McEachern argued that this witness had initially repeatedly denied identifying Stevenson or Thomas at the crime scene during his interview with the police. However, McEachern stated he had only later identified them as being there in order to be rewarded with more favorable sentencing for his ongoing criminal charges.

McEachern also disputed the prosecution’s DNA evidence by stating that “inside of the courtroom, DNA means nothing.” He elaborated that transfer DNA cannot be detected, so people could have their DNA falsely placed at a crime scene, and there is no way to determine how long DNA was at a location. \

McEachern concluded by stating that cell data tracking is not the same thing as GPS tracking, so the prosecution’s cell phone location evidence could only provide the jury with the approximate area Thomas’s phone was in, and could not place him at the crime scene with certainty.

The prosecution began their rebuttal by telling the jury that the defense was trying to distract them from the most incriminating evidence against the defendants.

The prosecution first reminded the jury that Stevenson’s girlfriend had been at the scene of the crime shortly before it occurred, along with two individuals who looked like the defendants. They stated that the clothing of the defendants was easily recognizable due to social media posts showing them wearing the same clothing that was seen on surveillance footage from the crime scene.

The prosecution responded to the defense’s questions regarding the reliability of the shooting victim’s testimony by stating that they were not asking the jury to believe him completely; instead, they wanted the jury to look at his testimony in relation to the other evidence.

They emphasized that even though the witness had not seen the surveillance camera footage from the day of the crime, his description of the events matched up perfectly with what occurred in the footage. The prosecution also argued that the witness had testified due to the guilt he felt after Terrence Allen’s death, and not because he expected any rewards from the prosecution.

The prosecution then responded to the defense’s arguments about the reliability of the DNA. They argued that there was no evidence of contamination in the case, and that the arguments that the defense was making about DNA should not be considered as evidence by the jury–they should only consider the DNA expert witness’s testimony.

Finally, the prosecution concluded by stating that although some types of evidence, such as DNA evidence and cell site data, needed expert testimony, other types of evidence did not. The prosecution told the jury that “You can look at footage and pictures and put two and two together,” and asked the jury to “hold the defendants accountable for using a firearm to settle whatever petty dispute they had.”

Jury instruction and deliberation began immediately after the closing statements and rebuttal.

Judge Denies Release in Homicide Case Amid Criminal History Debate

On Jan.30, DC Superior Court Judge Robert Okun denied the release request for a homicide suspect due to the nature of the crime and the defendant’s characteristics which favored detention.

Erin Sheffey, 28 is charged with second-degree murder, three counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon for his alleged involved in the murder of Kwiyon Maddox, 32, on Aug.15, 2021, on the 2100 block of 16th Street, SE.

During the hearing, defense attorney Rachel McCoy presented video evidence showing Maddox and an associate on a dirt bike speeding down 16th Street, SE, toward V Street, SE. McCoy argued that both individuals were armed and shot at Sheffey first, emphasizing the challenge in determining who fired the initial shot.

“It is clear that both individuals are armed. But you cannot see who shot first,” stated the defense. “Given that there are individuals on a vehicle and armed, it is the defense’s argument that the individuals on the dirt bike shot first,” McCoy added.

McCoy raised concerns about the investigation, highlighting the absence of video evidence showing the other side of the incident. She acknowledged the recovery of shell casings in the area but pointed out the lack of footage from the Good Hope Road area and 16th Street, SE.

The defense also argued that the evidence is neutral and insufficient to prove guilt. McCoy cited a 911 call mentioning a Black Kia, not linked to Sheffey, to support her claim. “The prosecution acknowledges that the evidence is neutral and not strong enough to prove guilt,” she added.

Sheffey’s criminal history was also a point of contention. McCoy asserted that his criminal record doesn’t raise significant concerns for someone his age. However, the government countered by discussing prior convictions involving firearms, drugs, and robberies, all coinciding with the time of the homicide.

McCoy said those arrests were not “papered,” meaning not prosecuted, and asked that the judge not consider them. “Please do not consider those no paper cases, because no paper was filed due to lack of evidence,” she stated.

The prosecution presented footage of an individual identified as Sheffey wearing a blue shirt and a baseball hat on V and U Street, moments before the dirt bike passed through and the shooting occurred. They argued that the defense’s video evidence fails to establish Maddox and his associate as aggressors.

“When you see a video with two people on a dirt bike, you can see that they are not the aggressors. The video shows that the dirt bike hit the floor first before the shooting happened,” prosecutors stated.

They contended that nine shots were fired in the area consistent with Sheffey’s location, and seven shots in the location where Maddox was, to support their claim that Sheffey shot first.

McCoy suggested an alternative scenario, arguing that the dirt bike could have fallen because Maddox and his associate shot first.

Judge Okun found this claim plausible and agreed with the prosecution to acknowledge Sheffey’s non-prosecuted arrests.

“I agree with the prosecution to give attention to the no paper arrests. The cases involved robberies, where the defendant’s DNA was found, all happening around the time of the homicide,” Judge Okun stated.

Judge Okun ruled in favor of detention, citing the serious nature of the second-degree murder while armed charge and the characteristics of the defendant.

The next status hearing is scheduled for March 15.

Shooting Defendant Accepts Plea Deal

On Jan. 30, a non-fatal shooting defendant accepted a plea deal extended by prosecutors in DC Superior Court Judge Michael Ryan’s courtroom.

Arnold Lawrance, 33, was originally charged with assault with a dangerous weapon and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence for his involvement in a non-fatal shooting incident that injured one individual, on Nov. 25, 2023, at the 1400 block of W Street, NW.

According to court documents, Lawrance shot the victim in the neck after the victim discovered that Lawrance had entered their apartment and taken property. The victim survived after being hospitalized.

During the hearing, defense attorney Wole Falodun alerted the court that Arnold was accepting a deal extended by prosecutors, which required him to plead guilty to one count of armed robbery in exchange for dismissal of all other charges, and the prosecution’s not seeking an indictment.

As part of the deal, according to court documents, the defendant will plead guilty to one count of armed robbery and the prosecution will not indict the defendant on any of the remaining charges, including unlawful discharge, and won’t recommend additional punishment beyond the maximum penalty, which is 30 years.

At the status hearing, the prosecution stated that had the case gone to trial, they would have proved Arnold’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Parties are slated to return for sentencing April 12.

Judge Weighs Granting House Arrest for Non-Fatal Shooting Defendant

On January 31, Superior Court Judge Maribeth Raffinan requested additional time to decide if she would release a defendant involved in a non-fatal shooting to house arrest.

Eric Davis, 35, is charged with assault with the intention to kill while armed for his alleged shooting of a local restaurant employee. The incident occurred on the afternoon of May 30, 2023, on the 1400 block of H Street, NE.

Davis waived his right to a preliminary hearing, advised to do so by his defense attorney, Michael Bruckheim. Bruckheim proceeded to motion for Davis to be placed on house arrest in anticipation of further court appearances.

Bruckheim detailed how Davis would be able to reside at his girlfriend’s home in the District. Bruckehim described that not only had Davis been “providing for the household as a whole,” but he also demonstrated a keen interest in joining the military upon his potential release.

Bruckheim said Davis’ support system, drive for a career, and minimal criminal history suggest that he would be cooperative with his potential release conditions.

“This would be an opportunity for Davis to show that he can be compliant with the stricter form of release,” Bruckheim said.

According to the prosecution, however, Davis should remain held.

“There hasn’t been a change in circumstances” the prosecution argued. “House arrest will not protect the community.”

The prosecution pointed out the violent nature of the incident, which was captured by surveillance footage obtained from the restaurant, alleging that Davis knew the victim before the crime. There are “multiple angles” of camera footage that show a figure resembling Davis pulling out a gun and shooting the victim, the prosecution said.

According to court documents, several witnesses were able to identify Davis by comparing the surveillance footage and pictures of Davis. The footage also reveals that the victim was shot in the chest and stomach several times.

“It is just by luck that the victim was not killed,” the prosecution said.

Judge Raffinan said she would need to review the case further before deciding on whether to hold or release Davis to house arrest.

Parties are slated to return on May 2.

Detective Testifies in First-Degree Murder Preliminary Hearing

On Jan. 31, a preliminary hearing was held, where video evidence and witness testimony was presented before DC Superior Court Judge Rainey Brandt, regarding a homicide case.

Deandre Miles, 28, is charged with first-degree premeditated murder while armed for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 28-year-old Davon Fuller on Oct. 16, 2023 at the 1500 block of Maryland Avenue, NE.

According to Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) documents, officers responded to the location for the report of a shooting. When they arrived, they located Fuller with gunshot wound injuries. He was transported to a local hospital, where he succumbed to his injuries.

On Dec. 27, Miles turned himself into MPD’s Homicide Branch, where he was arrested.

During the hearing, prosecution introduced a MPD homicide detective who identified Miles in the courtroom, physically pointing him out.

Prosecution displayed multiple video and photo exhibits collected from nearby establishments to refresh the witness’ memory regarding the incident.

According to the detective, the surveillance videos show two individuals, identified as Miles and Fuller, interacting at a Safeway. In another video, the individual identified as Miles is pointing a handgun at Fuller. Fuller is seen with a newspaper in his left hand and a knife in his right hand.

According to court documents, during an interrogation with MPD,, Miles claimed that Fuller “charged” at him inside the Safeway. However, the video exhibits presented by the prosecution seem to contradict these claims, rather showing Miles and Fuller walking down an aisle simultaneously.

Additionally, the detective stated that when reviewing this surveillance footage during the initial investigation, he could hear Fuller say to Miles, “Stop following me.”

Miles allegedly has had other contacts with police as well as mental health issues.

Due to time constraints, the detective was unable to finish his testimony.

Proceedings are set to resume Feb. 1

Shooting Defendant Accepts Plea Offer

On Jan. 31, a shooting defendant accepted a plea deal extended by prosecutors in DC Superior Court Judge Lynn Leibovitz’s courtroom.

Zaria Williams, 22, was originally charged with assault with a dangerous weapon, possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence for her involvement in a non-fatal shooting. The incident occurred on Sept. 15, 2023, on the 3900 block of Georgia Avenue, NW. No gunshot injuries were reported during the incident.

During the hearing, Williams’ attorney, Thomas Lester, alerted the court she was accepting a plea offer that required her to plead guilty to assault with a dangerous weapon and unlawfully carrying a pistol without a license, in exchange for the prosecution not seeking an indictment.

The prosecutors stated that, had the case gone to trial, they would have proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Williams was the perpetrator and acted voluntarily. She did not act in self-defense.

Lester requested Williams be released as she awaits sentencing, arguing she was pregnant at the time of the incident, and stated she should be on probation rather than serve jail time.

Judge Leibovitz denied the request, due to the nature and circumstances of the offense.

Williams is scheduled for sentencing on April 5.

Judge Grants Motion to Suppress Evidence From Defendant’s Phone

On Jan. 31, DC Superior Court Judge Rainey Brandt granted the defense’s motion to suppress phone evidence that was collected in a murder investigation.

Koran Jackson, 23, Reginald Steele, 24, Tyiion Kyree Freeman, 24, Stephen Nelson, 22, and Aaron Dequan Brown, 27, are charged with multiple counts of conspiracy, assault with the intent to kill while armed, first-degree murder while armed, carrying a pistol without a license, and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence in connection to the fatal shooting of 13-year-old Malachi Lukes on March 1, 2020 on the 600 block of S Street, NW. They are also accused in a separate incident the same day which left a seven-year-old boy suffering from gunshot wound injuries on the 2400 block of Alabama Avenue, SE.

During the hearing, two evidence motions were discussed.

The first entailed four phone calls supposedly between defendant Freeman and an alleged associate. During the call, the individuals reportedly discussed firearms related to Lukes’ homicide.

The defense requested these calls ultimately be disregarded, arguing that this acquaintance was not proven trustworthy due to previous unrelated criminal offenses and, further, the calls were unintelligible.

Freeman’s defense attorney, Shawn Sukumar, said, “A statement that cannot be understood is not a statement.” Parties will continue discussing this motion at a later date.

Additionally, parties considered defense’s motion to suppress any information from defendant Steele’s phone, that was recovered before he was taken in for questioning. Sukumar argued that the police did not have probable cause to seize the device.

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) lead detective testified on Jan. 25 that a search warrant was subsequently obtained for Steele’s phone, as he believed it contained evidence connected to the March 20 shooting.

Judge Brandt stated that while officers had probable cause to initially stop and question Steele due to reasonable suspicion, they did not have enough information to warrant a seizure of his cell phone.

The court ruled in the favor of the defense request to suppress the phone. Judge Brandt emphasized the lack of communication between officers on the night of March 1, 2020, stating that there was no information shared between officers where Steele was detained, and the apartment complex on Alabama Ave, where the shooting took place. It boiled down to “overworked officers not communicating.”

Officers initially picked up Steele’s phone after noticing it was simply lying on the ground during his initial detention, not for reason of probable cause. Judge Brandt concluded, “The devil is always in the details.”

The court is set to proceed motions on Feb. 1

Defense Requests Additional Time to Review Shooting Defendant’s Probation Case

On Jan. 30, DC Superior Court Judge Lynn Leibovitz granted a defendant’s request to focus on his status in an unrelated federal case before resolving probation in a 2020 shooting case.

Ronald Yarborough , 29, was originally charged with assault with a dangerous weapon and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence for his involvement in a non-fatal shooting that occurred on June 28, 2020 at the 400 block of 2nd Street, NW. He was also charged with unlawful possession of a firearm by a prior convict for being in possession of a firearm at the time of his arrest on July 23, 2020, at the same location.

On Dec. 22, 2020, Yarborough accepted a deal extended by prosecutors, which required him to plead guilty to assault with a dangerous weapon and unlawful possession of a firearm by a prior convict in exchange for a dismissal of all other charges, and dismissal of a misdemeanor case.

On May 3, 2021, DC Superior Court Judge Robert Okun sentenced Yarborough to 36 months for assault with a dangerous weapon and 18 months for unlawful possession of a firearm by a prior convict, the terms to be served concurrently.

He was also required to be on supervised probation for two years upon release.

On Jan 29, Yarborough allegedly violated his probation, and was detained in connection to an unrelated federal case. Donna Beasley requested Yarborough not be held in the current matter, arguing he should be permitted to continue with his probation and requested additional time to return once a proceeding is held in his federal case.

Parties are slated to return April 1.