Defendant Shot Murder Victim ‘In Cold Blood,’ Prosecution Says in Closing

Thank you for reading D.C. Witness.
Consider making a donation to help us continue our mission.

The jury trial for a shooting defendant ended with closing arguments before DC Superior Court Judge Rainey Brandt on Jan. 21.

Idrissa Fall, 38, also known as Idy, is charged with first-degree murder premeditated while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and unlawful possession of a firearm by a prior convict for his alleged involvement in the shooting of 29-year-old Dara Northern on July 18, 2021. The incident took place on the 6100 block of 4th Street, NW.

Northern was located inside her best friend’s vehicle on the 6800 block of 5th Street, NW.

During the prosecution’s closing, they argued that Fall had followed Northern to her best friend’s vehicle before shooting her through the passenger-side window. Fall and Northern were in a relationship but had gotten into several fights over Fall’s concern with Northern’s sexual orientation and alleged infidelity.

The prosecution argued that the shooting was premeditated, deliberate, and motivated. A few days before the shooting, Fall and Northern ended their relationship, causing Northern’s mother to force Fall out of their house. The prosecution also said that he acquired a gun and easily disabled security cameras before following Northern out of the house.

The prosecution played a recording of a 911 phone call during which Northern’s best friend pleaded for help and told the operator that Fall shot Northern.

“Idy shot her. He shot her through the window of my car,” the prosecution quoted.

They also presented surveillance footage which allegedly featured Fall running from the vehicle after the shooting. They argued that this evidence was consistent with Northern’s mother’s testimony, that she woke up and looked out the window to see Fall fleeing the scene.

Several days later, Fall allegedly told Northern’s mother that he was going to turn himself in.

“It was Idy who shot Dara Northern in cold blood,” the prosecution said.

Wole Falodun, Fall’s attorney, reminded the jury of the presumption of innocence and the burden the prosecution bears to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He argued that there were several unanswered questions and gray areas.

“If you have any unresolved questions, don’t look to Mr. Fall,” Falodun said. “Look to the [prosecution].”

The defense also argued that the expert witness testimonials failed to provide information about potential physical evidence by responding to questions with “I don’t know” and “I don’t recall”.

“As you sit here today, do you know if soot was found? You don’t know the answer to that question,” Falodun said.

Falodun ended by urging the jury to make a decision based on the facts.

“I submit to you that the [prosecution] has failed to [meet its burden],” Falodun said. “Find [Fall] not guilty.”

Parties will reconvene when the jury has reached a verdict.