Non-Fatal Stabbing Defendant Waives Preliminary Hearing, Detained

A non-fatal stabbing defendant waived her right to a preliminary hearing and was denied release on March 17 before DC Superior Court Judge Robert Hildum.

Denita Harris, 29, is charged with assault with a dangerous weapon for her alleged involvement in a stabbing that occurred on the unit block of Galveston Street, SE on Jan. 27. The victim was stabbed in the left thigh during the incident, and later transported to a hospital.

According to court documents, Harris and the victim had allegedly been in a relationship, and Harris was going to pick up her items from the victim’s residence. When Harris arrived at the house, the victim did not let her enter, and handed her items back. Harris then reportedly broke in through the back door, and stabbed the victim in the left thigh while he was on the phone with 911.

Harris waived her right to a preliminary hearing.

Adgie O’Bryant, Harris’ attorney, argued for Harris’ release in this case under conditions of a stay-away order, along with GPS monitoring and home confinement. O’Bryant stated Harris had a son to take care of and stable housing.

Prosecutors opposed release, since this was not the first time Harris had broken into the victim’s house and Harris has a past violent history, she should not be on release.

O’Bryant stated that a GPS and stay-away order would ensure that Harris does not return to the victim’s residence.

Judge Hildum denied the release request, saying that Harris had a civil stay-away order against her, running from 2025-to-2027, from a different individual. Judge Hildum also cited her criminal history including a simple assault and another assault with a dangerous weapon charge.

Parties are set to reconvene on April 15.

Jury Acquits Defendant of Obstructing Justice in Homicide Case

After less than a day of deliberations, jurors acquitted an obstruction of justice defendant before DC Superior Court Judge Michael Ryan on March 19.

Aillayh Carter, 29, was charged with two counts of obstructing justice for allegedly attempting to influence witnesses in a homicide case by initially claiming she was responsible.

On Feb. 20, Carter’s case was severed from her fiancé, Robert Carpenter, 37, who is charged with second-degree murder while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and unlawful possession of a firearm with a prior conviction for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 42-year-old Tremaine Nicholson. The incident occurred on May 7, 2024 on the 3400 block of 25th Street, SE.

After Judge Ryan clarified the jury’s confusion about certain language during the parties’ closing statements, the panel came back with a not guilty verdict on both counts.

In her happiness with the outcome, Carater asked if she could thank the jury personally after parties were dismissed, but was advised not to do so by Judge Ryan.

No further hearings were set for Carter.

Homicide Defendant Won’t Act as His Own Lawyer

A defendant in a fatal shooting case withdrew a request to defend himself in trial in front of DC Superior Court Judge Rainey Brandt on March 18.

Asani Forte, 28, is charged with conspiracy, first-degree premeditated murder while armed, assault with intent to kill while armed, assault with a dangerous weapon, three counts of possession of a firearm with a crime of violence, and the destruction of property less than $1,000. The charges stem from his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 34-year-old Delonte King on the 2800 block of 14th Street, NW, on Nov. 3, 2021.

According to court records, during a hearing on Jan. 23, Forte requested to represent himself at his upcoming trial on Aug. 31. On March 12, one of Forte’s defense attorneys, Susan Ellis, sent an email to the court stating that Forte was withdrawing the request following conversations with his lawyers.

During the most recent motions hearing, Judge Brandt asked Forte to confirm he had changed his mind about wanting to represent himself. “I have the best attorneys,” Forte said, confirming his decision to keep both Ellis and Russell Hairston as his defense counsel.

Although there is no outstanding plea offer, Judge Brandt reminded parties that the deadline for plea negotiations is April 30.

Parties are slated to reconvene on May 22.

Defense Claims Stabbing Defendant Wanted to Reject Plea Offer ‘From Day One’

A stabbing defendant rejected a plea offer before DC Superior Court Judge Jennifer Di Toro during a hearing on March 17.

Crystal Davis, 46, is charged with assault with a dangerous weapon for her alleged involvement in a stabbing that took place at the 1200 block of Missouri Avenue, NW on Feb. 6. The victim, the father of Davis’ child, sustained two lacerations to his forearm.

During the hearing, Davis’ attorney, Lola Ziadie, alerted parties that a trial date needs to be set in the case.

Ziadie stated that there had been no plea agreement reached, but that Davis had “said from day one,” that she didn’t want to accept a plea.

The prosecution countered saying they had extended a plea offer that required Davis to plead guilty to attempted assault with a dangerous weapon and two counts of misdemeanor obstruction of property. In exchange, the prosecution would waive immediate detention and cap allocution at the bottom of the applicable sentencing guidelines.

Ziadie said her client rejected the plea offer and wants to go to trial.

Judge Di Toro expressed concern about setting a trial date because of the deadline to begin trial within 100 days of arrest. Ziadie indicated that they would no longer agree to pause the timeline, and asked Judge Di Toro to start counting from Feb. 13 to set a trial date.

After considering this, Judge Di Toro scheduled trial to begin on June 2.

Parties are slated to reconvene on May 13.

Judge Won’t Remove Machete Stabbing Defendant’s GPS Monitor

DC Superior Court Judge Jennifer Di Toro denied a motion to remove GPS monitoring from a stabbing defendant at a hearing on March 17.

Eduavdo Gonzalez, 46, is charged with assault with a dangerous weapon for his alleged involvement in a stabbing that took place at the 5000 block of Yuma Court, NW on Feb. 7.

According to court documents, reportedly Gonzalez had a verbal argument with a relative. He allegedly became irritated and ran towards her, brandishing a machete. The victim sustained a laceration on her left hand.

Gonzalez’s attorney, Joseph Scrofano, asked Judge Di Toro to consider removing his client’s GPS monitoring device. He noted that Gonzalez has been compliant with his release conditions, is employed, and lives with his parents.

Scrofano explained when speaking to the victim, her only request was that Gonzalez receive mental health treatment and keep the stay away order in place.

The prosecution opposed the changel, arguing that Gonzalez’s actions during the incident weren’t just illegal but demonstrated his loss of self-control.

Judge Di Toro acknowledged that Gonzalez has no prior criminal record or outstanding warrants but agreed with the prosecution that the facts of the case were serious enough to warrant keeping GPS in place.

Parties are slated to reconvene on April 20.

Defense Argues Murder Defendant Needs Extensive Medical Care Awaiting Trial

Defense attorneys argued for eight specific medical needs a murder defendant must be provided while awaiting trial before DC Superior Court Judge Jason Park on March 13.

Desmond Barr, 25, is charged with one count of second-degree murder while armed, one count of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and one count of unlawful possession of a firearm for his alleged involvement in the death of 21-year-old Ambria Farmer. The incident occurred on the 3300 block of Fort Dupont Drive, SE on July 13, 2024.

Barr’s attorneys, Hannah Claudio and Dominique Winters, argued for eight specific medical treatments that Barr needs for his chronic injuries due to a past shooting and car accident he sustained before getting arrested.

Winters began her arguments, noting D.C. Witness reported on a different case on March 11, in which DC Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean granted a defendant’s bail due to lack of medical treatment.

“Worse it has ever been.” Winters stated on behalf of Barr’s about his swelling leg on March 7 from blood clots. Winters also shared that Barr was supposed to have a Telehealth appointment on March 6, but the appointment was cancelled.

Winters enumerated her eight requests for Barr’s medical needs starting with a physiatrist, someone who specializes in spinal cord treatment.

Physical therapy and occupational therapy were both included in Winter’s requests for Barr with sessions two times a week for an hour each.

Winters stated that Barr would need to receive wound care and imaging for follow-up treatment.

Barr had previously been seeing a hematologist, who determines blood disorders, and a urologist, who determines problems in urinary tracts and the male reproductive system. While awaiting trial Barr has not received care for either issue, and Winter’s requested that he have access to both.

resulting from a car accident before his arrest. According to a doctor hired by the defense team, Barr has loose screws in his back and needs surgery to help alleviate pain.

Barr also suffers from a bone infection in his foot, leading to Winter’s request for a podiatrist to see Barr while he is in jail.

Winters’ last medical request was for another custom wheelchair for Barr. Barr previously had a custom wheelchair, but it broke and was taken away by the Department of Corrections (DOC).

Judge Park asked the DOC representative in the hearing if the previous wheelchair could be fixed. The DOC representative stated they did not know the location of the wheelchair currently, but assumed it was in storage.

In a hearing last October, a witness for the Department of Corrections (DOC), testified that Barr was receiving consistent care. He claimed the DOC had provided four wheelchairs, two of which Barr declined, and confirmed that the jail was conforming to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). He also reported that a special wheelchair assigned to Barr was inoperable, as was a handicap shower in the jail, though the shower has since been repaired.

The DOC witness also cited the jail’s healthcare director, who reported that Barr has received 103 wound treatments, more than 80 doctor appointments, mental health services, and a urology consultation. He said one of Barr’s wounds was nearly healed. He did not provide details on physical therapy.

In the current hearing, Judge Park granted all the medical requests.. If the needs are not met in a timely fashion Judge Park asked Winters and Claudio to file a motion for another hearing.

Parties are set to reconvene on Jan. 8, 2027.

Parties Delay Sentencing for 2025 Shooting Near Elementary School

Parties delayed sentencing in a 2025 non-fatal shooting case near a school before DC Superior Judge Errol Arthur on March 16.

Wilson Dodson, 45, pleaded guilty on Dec. 6, 2025 to assault with a dangerous weapon and unlawful possession of a firearm with a prior conviction greater than one year for his involvement in a shooting that occurred near Sela Public Charter Elementary School, at the intersection of Peabody Street and Chillum Place, NE on May 22, 2025.

Dodson fired five shots towards an SUV that was occupied by two people and toward another individual who was on a motorized scooter. No injuries were reported.

The hearing was called two hours after it was scheduled. The prosecution requested a continuance due to an important appointment later that day that would have interfered with the current hearing.

After confirming Judge Arthur had not reviewed the previously submitted pre-sentence report, the prosecution renewed its request for a continuance to allow time for review and accommodate scheduling.

Parties are scheduled to reconvene for sentencing on April 7.

Judge Agrees Shooting Defendant Mentally Competent

A shooting defendant was found mentally competent to stand trial before DC Superior Court Judge Judith Pipe on March 17.

Natalie Bisher, 25, is charged with aggravated assault knowingly while armed for her alleged involvement in a shooting on the 300 block of Evarts Street, NE on Nov. 27, 2025. The victim sustained a gunshot wound to the abdomen that required surgery.

According to a report filed on March 16 from the Department of Behavioral Health (DBH) Bisher was mentally competent. To stand trial, a defendant must have sufficient mental competence to understand the charges against them and be able to help their attorney defend the case.

At the hearing, neither party had any objections to DBH’s findings and Judge Pipe certified the result.

According to the DBH report, during Bisher’s competency evaluation she expressed concerns about her then attorney, James Ryan. After a brief discussion, Judge Pipe appointed Michelle Lockard to represent Bisher moving forward.

Parties are slated to reconvene on March 20.

Released Stabbing Defendant Rejects Prosecution’s Plea Offer

A stabbing defendant rejected a plea offer for attempted assault with a dangerous weapon before DC Superior Court Judge Judith Pipe on March 16.

Shamika Crawford, 41, is charged with assault with a dangerous weapon, threatening to injure or kidnap a person, and destruction of property less than $1000 stemming from her alleged involvement in a non-fatal stabbing on Jan. 6 on the unit block of Anacostia Road, SE.

Crawford allegedly had a verbal dispute with the victim, who she was in a relationship with at the time, that led to physical violence. According to court documents, police reported to the scene earlier in the day for the dispute, but were unable to contact Crawford inside the house.

After an hour the police returned to the same address in response to a call about a fight, allegedly involving Crawford and the victim. Court documents stated that the victim was seen with lacerations on his left arm, which he claimed were inflicted by Crawford. Crawford also allegedly sliced his tires with the same weapon.

The prosecution extended an offer that required Crawford to plead guilty to one count of attempted assault with a dangerous weapon. In exchange the prosecution would dismiss all other charges.

Crawford declined the plea offer, and stated she would like to move towards a trial.

However, John Machado, Crawford’s attorney, stated he is open to continuing negotiations with the prosecution pending indictment. The deadline is Oct. 7. Machado recently received body-worn camera footage from the incident and intends on filing a counter offer after speaking with Crawford.

Machado requested a change in release conditions for Crawford, citing her full compliance and lack of a criminal record. The change would remove the current GPS monitoring, but keep the stay away order in place for the complainant.

Judge Pipe granted the motion.

Parties are set to reconvene on Oct. 8.

Suspended Sentence in Domestic Violence Stabbing, Defendant Pleads Guilty

A domestic violence stabbing defendant pleaded guilty and was given a suspended sentence by DC Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean on March 17.

Dameera Williams, 25, was originally charged with assault with a dangerous weapon for her involvement in a domestic violence stabbing on the 2400 block of Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, SE, on Jan. 8. The victim was stabbed in the back.

In court, Williams accepted an offer from prosecutors that required her to plead guilty to simple assault. She understood that the maximum penalty for this charge is 180 days imprisonment. In exchange, she would not be charged with the more serious offense.

Had the case gone to trial, the prosecution said they would have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that, “Williams got in a verbal altercation with the victim, and once the victim turned his back away from her, she grabbed a knife and stabbed him in the back.”

After accepting Williams’ guilty plea, Judge McLean allowed the prosecutors to read a victim impact statement that supported rather than criticized her.

in summary, wrote that Williams is his significant other and that his family is struggling without her. It has been hard being a single father to their two young children, and in their 14 year long relationship, she had never been violent toward him or their children once, he said.

On the other hand, prosecutors said Williams’ crimes were unnecessary and horrific. The victim suffered a collapsed lung and a required blood transfusion in the ambulance. Furthermore, Williams lied to police officers that the victim had fallen on the knife in an open dishwasher, asserted the prosecution.

Prosecutors requested a 180 day sentence, suspending all but 120 days in hopes of preventing further harm.

Theresa Jenkins, Williams’ attorney requested a fully suspended sentence and one year of probation.

Williams told Judge McLean that she wants to go home and be with her kids.

Judge McLean sentenced Williams to 180 days, suspending all but time served, and one year of supervised probation. She is required to complete anger management courses and take part in mental health assessments.

Following the hearing, Williams will be released from the DC Jail. If she fails to meet the requirements of her probation, Judge McLean can require her to complete the required jail time.

No further dates are set for the parties.

Case Acquitted: Detective Says Obstruction Defendant Claimed Responsibility for Homicide

Editor’s Note: Aillayh Carter was acquitted of all charges by a jury on March 19, 2026.

A detective testified that an obstruction defendant took responsibility for a fatal shooting she didn’t commit in a trial before DC Superior Court Judge Michael Ryan on March 18.

Aillayh Carter, 29, is charged with two counts of obstruction of justice for her alleged attempt to influence two witnesses in a homicide case.

Carter’s case was severed on Feb. 20 from her fiancé, Robert Carpenter, 37, who is charged with second-degree murder while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and unlawful possession of a firearm with a prior conviction. These charges stem from his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 42-year old Tremaine Nicholson on the 3400 block of 25th Street, SE, on May 7, 2024. Nicholson sustained four gunshot wounds.

Before the jury entered the courtroom, Carter’s attorney, Gregory Copeland, asked Judge Ryan to require the prosecution to refrain from calling the incident a “murder” and instead call it a “killing.”

Copeland claims that the prosecution is, “proceeding in this case as if it is a murder case” which it is not because Carter is not charged with murder.

Judge Ryan agreed with Copeland and asked the prosecution to be more careful with their language going forward because “words matter.”

In the video evidence provided by the prosecution that showed the outside of Carter’s apartment, the lead detective on the case pointed out a truck that belonged to Carpenter, proving he was at Carter’s apartment on the day of the homicide.

After the incident, the detective said body-worn camera footage showed an interview between him and Carter in which the detective said Carter would constantly be crying and then go silent. The detective testified Carter told police that Carpenter was there to drop off a pack of cigarettes at her apartment and left right after, having no involvement in the homicide.

According to the detective, throughout the interview, Carter consistently took responsibility for shooting Nicholson and questioned why the detective kept asking her about Carpenter.

The detective discussed additional body-worn camera footage in which an officer encountered Carter crying outside her apartment and “claimed” to the officer that she was injured.

During cross-examination, Copeland challenged the detective’s use of the word “claimed” when talking about Carter’s injury. He pointed out that Carter went to the hospital due to hyperventilation after the shooting. In response, the detective said that they use the term “claimed” when referring to statements that are made by any suspects in a case.

A forensic medical examiner described Nicholson’s multiple gunshot wounds that determined the cause of death was a homicide. The witness detailed four gunshot wounds: one to the left shoulder, one to the left lower back, and two to the back of his head and neck. They confirmed Nicholson had high levels of marijuana in his system when he died.

The prosecution reviewed DNA evidence obtained from a swab of Carter’s cheek and remnants from from her clothing. The witnesses confirmed there were no errors made in analyzing her DNA.

A DNA analyst verified the integrity of the test results showing Carter’s DNA was likely in the clothing she wore during the incident that Carpenter’s DNA was probably present as well.

A ballistics specialist testified that after examining the shell casings recovered from the scene and comparing them to other shell casings, he concluded that they were consistent with bullets fired from the gun in evidence. According to court documents and past testimony, the gun was recovered from Carpenter’s truck.

Parties will reconvene on March 19.

Defendant Pleads Guilty to Stabbing His Child’s Mother

A defendant pleaded guilty to stabbing his child’s mother before DC Superior Court Judge Andrea Hertzfeld on March 17.

Mark Henry, 38, was originally charged with assault with a dangerous weapon for a stabbing at the intersection of Sycamore and Oak Drive, SE on Nov. 10, 2025.

According to court documents, Henry and the victim have a 14-year-old child together. The victim sustained two puncture wounds and one laceration to the left side of her torso.

At the hearing, Henry said he did not believe the number was accurate because he only recalls swinging the knife once. However, he could not confirm how many wounds he believed the victim received.

“I didn’t see any wounds,” Henry said.

Henry accepted a deal that required him to plead guilty to attempted assault with a dangerous weapon. In exchange, the prosecutors agreed to limit Henry’s sentence to the bottom third of the sentencing guidelines and to not seek an indictment with additional charges.

Despite the disagreement, Henry confirmed with Judge Hertzfeld that the prosecution would have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he stabbed the victim after a verbal argument if the case went to trial.

Henry’s defense attorney, Tonya Harris, requested that Henry’s mental health history, which the defense wants to argue in support of a lesser sentence, be considered separately from his competency to stand trial. To go on trial, a defendant must understand the charges and be able to help his attorney.

Judge Hertzfeld said Harris would need to submit a request to the pre-sentence report writers.

Parties are scheduled to reconvene for sentencing on May 18.

Plea Deal Expires for Homicide Defendant

A plea deal expired for a defendant accused of fatally shooting a man who struck his girlfriend before DC Superior Court Judge Michael Ryan on March 13.

Aaron Jones, 31, is charged with second-degree murder while armed, assault with intent to kill while armed, two counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and unlawful possession of a firearm with a prior conviction greater than a year. The charges stem from his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 44-year-old Bobby Addison at the 3200 block of 28th Street, SE on July 28, 2024. Addison sustained eight gunshot wounds.

According to court documents, a witness reported seeing Jones and Addison arguing outside of their apartment complex. The witness said Jones’ girlfriend came outside and was struck by Addison and fell to the ground. Jones then allegedly fired around 10 shots at Addison, said the witness.

The prosecution notified parties that a deal was previously extended to Jones. If Jones accepted, he would have pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter while armed. In exchange, the prosecution would agree to dismiss the greater and remaining charges against him.

The prosecution reported there was no response from the defense and the pending plea offer expired.

Afterwards, defense attorneys, Diana Yu and Christen Phillips, waived the right to independent DNA testing on Jones’ behalf.

Parties are slated to reconvene June 10 to schedule trial dates.

Case Acquitted: Eyewitnesses Testify They Were Told to Lie About Homicide

Editor’s Note: Aillayh Carter was acquitted of all charges by a jury on March 19, 2026.

Two witnesses testified they were told by a defendant to claim to police she was the perpetrator of murder instead of the actual suspect in a proceeding before DC Superior Court Judge Michael Ryan on March 17.

Aillayh Carter, 29, is charged with two counts of obstructing justice of a witness or officer for allegedly attempting to influence two witnesses in a murder case.

Carter’s case was previously severed on Feb. 20 from her fiancé, Robert Carpenter, 37, who is charged with second-degree murder while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and unlawful possession of a firearm with a prior conviction for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 42-year-old Tremaine Nicholson on May 7, 2024 on the 3400 block of 25th Street, SE.

According to the prosecution and court documents, Carter allegedly attempted to take responsibility for the murder.

A witness to the crime, who identified herself as Carter’s godmother the previous day in trial, testified that she told detectives that Carter committed the crime because Carter asked her to “tell them that I did it because that’s what I told them” during a phone call after the incident. One of Carter’s charges stems from allegedly attempting to influence her godmother.

“She will always be my goddaughter,” the witness said.

Carter’s attorney, Gregory Copeland, attempted to determine whether Carter and her godmother spoke before or after the godmother was initially interviewed by detectives. However, the godmother stated that she was unsure when exactly this conversation took place.

The godmother, who was getting her hair done by Carter at her apartment and the location of the offense, said that she did not witness the shooting but did see Nicholson enter the apartment “huffing and puffing” and asking where his son was. Nicholson was the father of Carter’s child.

The prosecution also called Carter’s godmother’s husband who was also present during the incident and Carter allegedly attempted to influence.

During questioning from the prosecution, the husband told the jury that Nicholson entered the apartment and demanded to see his son. With balled fists, said the husband, Nicholson paced back and forth repeating “I wanna see my son, I wanna see my f***ing son.” Their son was not in the apartment at that time, but Carter was “yelling historically for him to leave,” said the husband.

Subsequently, the husband said Nicholson lunged at Carter’s neck. “He was this close from choking her out,” the husband stated he saw before he heard gunshots.

He didn’t recall seeing any firearms before, during, or after the incident. When asked, he said he didn’t see who fired the shots because he was more concerned with his, and his wife’s, safety.

The husband said Carter told him “handle ya’ll business,” and “I’ma handle this,” after the shooting. He and his wife left the scene without calling 911.

The next day, the husband said Carter called his wife. He overheard the call because it was on speaker, and heard Carter ask them to say she was the shooter. “I told [Carter] it was a stupid idea, but go with it,” the husband said.

The prosecutor asked if the husband lied about who the shooter was. He said, when detectives interviewed him, he didn’t think they would believe what happened, and instead would assume it was a “lovers’ quarrel,” therefore he lied.

However, “the police didn’t buy it,” the husband said and then he told them Carpenter shot Nicholson.

On cross-examination, Copeland insisted it was the husband’s decision to lie because Carter never specified who to tell that she was the shooter or to lie to police, detectives, or in a trial.

A crime scene analyst with the Department of Forensic Sciences (DFS) also testified that he recovered a firearm from the interior of a vehicle registered to Carpenter which he swabbed for DNA material. According to court documents, Carpenter reportedly drove this vehicle the day of the incident.

Further, a forensic scientist with DFS testified about retrieving a buccal sample from the Homicide Branch of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD). Court documents show that this swab was reportedly used to tie Carpenter to the crime and exclude Carter.

The trial is scheduled to continue on March 18.

A ‘Trove of Surveillance’ Turned Over Two Weeks From Murder Trial

The defense in a murder case alerted DC Superior Court Judge Michael Ryan a “trove of surveillance” evidence was “disturbingly” turned over just two weeks prior to the trial on March 13.

James Lewis, 48, is charged with second-degree murder while armed, possession of a prohibited weapon, and three counts of contempt. The charges stem from his alleged involvement in the fatal stabbing of 30-year-old Brenea Franklin at the 1100 block of Bellevue Street, SE on Jan. 30, 2021. Franklin sustained a laceration to her neck.

Mani Golzari, Lewis’ attorney, said the prosecution recently turned over 80 hours of surveillance footage just two weeks before the start of the trial, putting the defense at an unfair advantage.

“There was a trove of surveillance that we didn’t know about,” Golzari said.

The evidence reportedly contained footage of the hours before and after the incident. A camera angle allegedly capturing Franklin walking into a liquor store, which Golzari described as vital to the investigation.

Previously, the defense requested the prosecution ensure they had provided all existing evidence. The prosecution confirmed they provided everything at the time, according to Golzari.

Golzari filed a motion to address the recent surveillance turnover and possible problems that could hinder the defense, because the material came in so late.

Immediately after, the prosecution reportedly revoked a plea agreement which Golzari claimed he did not have a chance to review with Lewis.

The prosecutor said the plea deal would have required Lewis to plead guilty to second-degree murder while armed and they would dismiss the remaining charges. They also would request a sentence in the bottom half of the guidelines.

Golzari characterized the sudden surveillance reveal and plea revocation as “disturbing.”

“I will not insult anyone’s intelligence in this courtroom,” Golzari stated, frustrated by his belief that the prosecution did not adequately resolve the apparent disadvantage placed on the defense. “I have now spent days trying to figure out what other evidence is lurking.”

Golzari asked, “Is there any other surveillance video the [prosecution] has that has not been turned over to the defense?”

The prosecution said they do not believe it is appropriate to “go tit-for-tat” with questions, then asked “has the defense ever watched [the footage]?”

According to the prosecution, they had sent only 10 additional hours of film and revoked the plea because the agreement was contingent that the defense would not file any further motions.

Judge Ryan ordered the parties to file motions articulating their positions to settle the dispute.

Parties are slated to reconvene March 19.

Search