Search Icon Search site

Search

Judge Releases Defendant to Home Confinement in 15-Year-Old Shooting Case

DC Superior Court Judge Todd Edelman released a shooting defendant accused of a 2010 shooting to home confinement after finding he was not a risk to the community on April 3.

Terry Greene, 35, is charged with assault with intent to kill while armed and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence for his alleged involvement in the non-fatal shooting of a man on the 5800 block of Fields Place, NE, on June 17, 2010. The victim suffered multiple gunshot wounds to the body.

Judge Edelman said he received and reviewed records from the Maryland Department of Corrections relating to Greene’s incarceration there. According to Judge Edelman, the records showed no violent conduct or contraband weapons violations.

The prosecutor requested Judge Edelman consider the nature of the offense and not alter Greene’s confinement.

Judge Edelman noted that, while he did find probable cause Greene committed the crime, it has been more than 15 years since the incident. This weakened the assumption that Greene was a risk to the community, Judge Edelman said.

Greene had strong family support at his prior hearings, according to Judge Edelman, and Greene’s family was present in the courtroom.

Judge Edelman granted Greene’s release on home confinement with a GPS monitor to be attached before he left the courthouse. Greene will live with his wife and will only be allowed to leave for medical appointments, meetings with his lawyer, court hearings, or verified employment purposes.

Greene is not allowed to own dangerous weapons, firearms, or simulations, said Judge Edelman.

Judge Edelman told Greene restrictions could be relaxed if he is complaint, but he could be sent back to jail if he violates the conditions of his release.

Parties are scheduled to reconvene on July 10.

Pending Global Plea Could Erase Jail Stabbing Case

A jail stabbing defendant received a plea offer in a separate, U.S. District Court case that could dismiss another matter before DC Superior Court Judge Todd Edelman on April 2. 

Cedae Hardy, 21, is charged with assault with intent to kill while armed in connection to his alleged involvement in a stabbing at the DC Jail on the 1900 block of D Street, SE on Oct. 12, 2025. The victim sustained 10 wounds. 

Chidi Ogolo, Hardy’s defense attorney, notified the court there is a possible global resolution–a plea that combines the District Court case with the one pending in DC Superior Court–that would terminate the stabbing case. However, Ogolo isn’t aware of the details.

The prosecution informed the defense and Judge Kravitz that the the District Court case is working separately from Ogolo’s. Judge Edelman asked about an approximate timeline for a decision, but the prosecutor couldn’t provide a specific date. 

Judge Edelman set another hearing three weeks out to give time for the other case to resolve.

Parties are slated to reconvene on April 20.

Defendant Pleads Not Guilty to Fatally Shooting 3-Year-Old

A homicide defendant pleaded not guilty to 10 indictment charges involving the death of a toddler before DC Superior Court Judge Rainey Brandt in a hearing on April 3. 

Charles Rucker, 25, is charged with first-degree murder while armed against a minor, three counts of assault with intent to kill while armed, four counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, tampering with physical evidence, and unlawful possession of a firearm with a prior conviction for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of three-year-old Honesty Cheadle, on the 1000 block of 14th Street, SE, on July 5, 2025. Cheadle sustained a gunshot wound to her head and succumbed to her injuries on July 7, 2025.

At the hearing, the court arraigned Rucker reading the indictment charges against him. Rachel Cicurel, Rucker’s defense attorney, pleaded not guilty on his behalf and requested that they receive all evidence relating to the case.

The prosecutors informed parties that almost all evidence for the case have been turned over to the defense, besides the DNA results, which are currently being tested. Once they have the results, they will turn them over.

Parties are slated to reconvene on June 26. 

Judge Okays Release of Homicide Defendant for Medical Care 

DC Superior Court Judge Jason Park will order the release of a homicide defendant in order for him to receive medical care at MedStar Washington Hospital Center in a hearing April 1. 

Desmond Barr, 25, is charged with second-degree murder while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and unlawful possession of a firearm with a prior conviction greater than one year for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 21-year-old Ambria Farmer on the 3300 block of Fort Dupont Drive, SE, on July 13, 2024. The charges face an aggravating factor of allegedly being committed during Barr’s release for another case.

Barr, not present at the hearing, is currently receiving medical care at Howard University Hospital, according to Hannah Claudio, one of his attorneys.

Claudio and Dominique Winters, Barr’s other defense attorney, drafted a release plan to ensure he is able to receive medical care. Judge Park reviewed their plan before the present hearing. 

According to Winters, the defense does not have a way to transport Barr to MedStar Washington Hospital Center. She proposed the Department of Corrections (DOC) transfer Barr before he is released from their custody. 

The release plan would require GPS monitoring, and Barr would also have to stay at the treatment facility 24 hours a day, according to Judge Park

Jodi Metz, Chief of the Office of Rehabilitation and Development (ORD) at the Public Defender Service (PDS), said Barr would be eligible for Medicare and Medicaid after his release. 

Judge Park said that Barr is facing an “acute medical issue” and has been hospitalized for five-to-six days. He said the proposed release plan seems “appropriate and sensible.” 

However, Judge Park said he is “not confident” that home confinement would be appropriate after Barr is released from treatment. He said there are “severe indications of danger in this case.” 

Prosecutors said the safety of the community and Barr’s health are equally important. They said the victim’s next of kin agrees with their position and would fear for their safety if Barr was to be released.

Judge Park said the prosecutor’s strength of evidence has increased and said the plan is “efficient” to ensure the safety of the community at “this specific time.” 

Judge Park set a bond review hearing for April 14 to discuss Barr’s release status. 

Parties are scheduled to reconvene on April 3.

Case Acquitted: Judge Denies Shooting Defendant’s Request For Dismissal Despite Rouge Witness

Editor’s Note: Marquis Allen was acquitted of all charges by a jury on April 9, 2026. 

DC Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean denied the defense’s request to dismiss a shooting case after claims the prosecution is making insufficient efforts to bring their witness to court on April 1. 

Marquis Allen, 32, is charged with assault with a dangerous weapon, possession of firearm during crime of violence, threats to kidnap or injure a person, and unlawful possession of a firearm with a prior conviction greater than a year for his alleged involvement in a shooting that occurred on Aug. 19, 2025 at the 3500 block of East Capitol Street, SE. 

During the hearing, the prosecution mentioned that their witness agreed to appear for the trial, but was not present in court.

Allen’s defense attorney, Shawn Sukumar, argued that the prosecution has been making insufficient efforts to bring the witness in and is not prepared for trial. Sukumar requested Judge McLean dismiss the case.  

Judge McLean denied Sukumar’s request for dismissal and said that the prosecution is making reasonable efforts to communicate with the witness. The judge cited text messages where the witness stated that she would come into court and that she received the subpoena through an email.

Judge McLean told the parties that the US Marshals will try to find the witness and bring her in court to testify. The prosecutors notified their intent to submit a material witness form, a warrant for the arrest of a witness to secure their testimony, which Judge McLean said she will approve. 

Parties are set to reconvene on April 2. 

Scissors Stabbing Defendant Rejects Plea Offer Before Trial

A stabbing defendant rejected a plea offer and parties selected a jury before DC Superior Court Judge Robert Salerno on April 1. 

Stephanie Fawbush, 51, is charged with two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon and threatening to kidnap or injure a person. All charges originally faced an aggravating circumstance of the victim being a Metro Transit officer and a station manager. The charges stem from her alleged involvement in a stabbing that occurred on the 900 block of 17th Street, NW on Aug. 14, 2023. 

According to court documents, Fawbush reportedly approached the female victim, arguing with her unprovoked. A fight broke out, Fawbush then pulled a pair of scissors out of her bag and allegedly tried to stab the female victim. The male victim intervened and Fawbush allegedly stabbed him in the arm.

During the hearing, the prosecution stated that they sent a new plea offer to the defense, which Fawbush rejected over email. The plea offer would’ve had Fawbush plead guilty to two counts of simple assault, misdemeanor threats, and possession of a prohibited weapon. If Fawbush accepted, the prosecution would have dismissed the other charges.

Judge Salerno clarified that the plea offer the prosecution extended would convict Fawbush on misdemeanor charges. He warned her that, if she were convicted at trial, she would face felony charges. Fawbush told Judge Salerno she understood and still rejected the plea offer.

Fawbush’s attorney, Tammy Thom, stated that she filed a motion on March 26 to dismiss the charge of threatening to kidnap or injure a person committed against a transit operator. According to the motion, T an enhancement was not applicable because the charge of threats is not a crime of violence. 

Judge Salerno agreed, dismissing the enhancement on the charge of threatening to kidnap or injure a person. 

After Fawbush rejected the plea, parties selected a jury for her trial.

Parties are slated to reconvene on April 2.

Judge Amends Teen Carjacking Defendant’s Release Conditions

DC Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean granted a carjacking defendant’s request to relax his release conditions to a curfew allowing time for work and school on April 1.

Kavon Johnson, 19, is charged with unarmed carjacking and assault with intent to commit robbery, both committed against a transportation provider, strangulation, and threatening to kidnap or injure a person for his alleged involvement in a carjacking on Dec. 13, 2025 on the 4600 block of Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, SW. 

According to court documents, a physical altercation started between Johnson and the driver in an Uber vehicle. Johnson allegedly pulled on the victim’s shirt, disrupting normal breathing and blood circulation, before taking the victim out of the car and striking him in the head. Then, Johnson allegedly entered the victim’s vehicle and threatened him for his keys.

The victim sustained a fractured collarbone, skull injuries, and visible abrasions to the side of the neck from the incident.

According to Janai Reed, Johnson’s attorney, Johnson is currently released on home confinement with GPS monitoring. A representative from Pretrial Services Agency (PSA), reported that Johnson was in full compliance with his release conditions. 

Reed requested Judge McLean to amend Johsnon’s release conditions to a curfew, so Johnson can work again and continue school. She expressed that prior to the incident, Johnson nearly completed high school and was employed at Amazon. Johnson didn’t work at Amazon during normal curfew hours, he started work at 1:20 a. m., according to Reed. 

The prosecution did not object to the defense’s request, but they requested Johnson pre-approve leaving his house with PSA, which Judge McLean agreed to. 

“[Johnson] has potential to resume work and resume school,” said Judge McLean. 

As a result, Judge McLean stated Johnson will remain in home confinement until he pre-approves his work and school with PSA.

Parties are slated to reconvene on May 28.

MPD Has No Suspects in Custody For March Homicides

According to D.C. Witness data, there were five reported homicide incidents leaving five victims in March. This is a significant decrease from ten reported homicide incidents in February.

As of April 3, The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) does not have any suspects for any of the five homicides. Among the homicides, two resulted from vehicle crashes, one victim was hit by a vehicle, and two were shootings.

On March 9, Terrance Lavelle Crutchfield, 31, was fatally shot on the 5000 block of E Street, SW. 

Fifteen days later on March 24, 26-year-old Jamal Blake was shot and killed on the 2000 block of Benning Road, NE.

Although it was a relatively quiet month for homicides in DC, MPD has yet to make any arrests and is currently offering a reward for information on the unsolved cases.

March 2026 Homicides in Washington, DC (Symbol map)

Judge Sentences Fatal Stabbing Defendant to 8 Years in Prison

DC Superior Court Judge Michael Ryan sentenced a fatal stabbing defendant to eight years of imprisonment on April 3. 

Frank Rooks, 56, also known as Frank Flythe, pleaded guilty on Dec. 12, 2025 to voluntary manslaughter for his involvement in the fatal stabbing of 31-year-old Vance Contee on Nov. 16, 2024 on the 4000 block of Kansas Avenue, NW. Contee sustained stab wounds to his chest and back. 

As part of the plea deal, parties agreed to a sentence of eight years of imprisonment, subject to Judge Ryan’s approval. 

At sentencing, Judge Ryan stated he would try and balance the sense of justice for both sides. Justice “is sometimes misperceived by the parties,” he said, because rarely is anyone happy with the sentence.

Before requesting Rooks’ sentence, the prosecutor called upon Contee’s loved ones to give victim impact statements. 

“Contee was like a brother to me,” Contee’s friend said. “He was my brother in spirit, in soul, and in reputation.” Contee’s friend detailed his relationship with Contee, explaining how they grew up together, shared similar experiences, and had a lot of the same dreams and goals. Now, those dreams will never be realized, he said.

Contee’s friend told Judge Ryan he had been previously convicted at age 16 in a different murder and spent 26 years in prison. He said he understood being locked up and had once been in a similar place as Rooks, but he had “to call for accountability.” 

“As you impose your sentence, really think about accountability,” he said to Judge Ryan.

Contee’s sister stated Contee “wasn’t just a victim in this case. He was loved, he was growing, he mattered.” Contee “loved openly,” Contee’s sister said. “He would always say ‘Sis, I love you,’ and now, I’ll never get to hear those words again.”

According to Contee’s sister, Rooks has a violent history and has taken a life before. Afterwards, he was given the opportunity to rehabilitate and return to the community, yet he took another life, she said. She questioned how many chances someone should receive before another life is taken. “This is not just about my brother, it’s about what happens next,” she told Judge Ryan. 

Contee “was a deeply loved member of our family,” Contee’s niece said. “He brought so much laughter, joy, love, and support to our life.” “My family and I will never be the same,” she stated. 

The prosecutor said “the taking of a human life is one of the worst crimes you can commit.” The loss felt by Contee’s loved ones is “indescribable,” she contended. 

She asked Judge Ryan to impose the sentence of eight years followed by five years of supervised release. “This sentence guarantees that the defendant will be held accountable for his actions,” she argued.

According to Terrance Austin, Rooks’ attorney, Rooks has had a lifelong battle with substance addiction and mental health issues. “It is crystal clear that a life inside of a prison cell isn’t appropriate” for a man like Rooks, he said. 

Austin argued a long prison sentence isn’t necessary for this case because Rooks doesn’t take this incident lightly. Eight years is significant for someone of Rooks’ age, mental and physical condition.

Additionally, Austin noted it isn’t clear whether the prosecution would’ve been able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rooks was guilty had this case gone to trial. This plea deal represents a concession on both ends, he stated, because “a trial is a risk for everyone.” He asked Judge Ryan to accept the agreed upon sentence of eight years.

Rooks apologized to Contee’s family in a statement to the court. “I admit I was wrong for what I done,” he said. He stated that if he could go back in time and change what he did, he would. 

The judge said there isn’t anything he can do to write the wrong of losing a loved one. No matter the length of the sentence, eight or 80 years, Contee’s loved ones would never be whole, he said. 

Judge Ryan explained that not accepting the agreed upon sentence of eight years would lead to a trial, where the outcome of the case is unknown. Because of that, Judge Ryan said that eight years is “a fair resolution” based on everything he knows about the case.

Judge Ryan sentenced Rooks to eight years followed by five years of supervised release. He recommended Rooks receive mental health and substance use testing and treatment, pay $100 to the Victims of Violent Crime Fund (VVCF), and receive credit for time served.

No further dates were set.

Judge Sets Deadline for Prosecutors to Turn Over Evidence in Stabbing Case

DC Superior Court Judge Andrea Hertzfeld set a deadline for the prosecution to turn over any remaining evidence in a stabbing case to the defense on March 30.

Tiana Robinson, 31, is charged with assault with a dangerous weapon for her alleged involvement in a stabbing on the 100 block of M Street, SE on Oct. 15, 2025.

Robinson’s codefendant, Kenneth Evans, 29, is charged with simple assault for his alleged involvement in the same incident.

According to court documents, the two victims reported that Robinson and Evans followed them after the two groups had gotten into a fight earlier that night. Members of the National Guard tried to break the groups apart. Evans then reportedly punched an individual in the face. The victim attempted to defend his cousin who was punched, when Robinson allegedly stabbed him in the hand.  

During the hearing, Robinson’s attorney, Sean McCliggott, told Judge Hertzfeld there were issues with the prosecution turning over evidence to the defense. He stated that he was still missing body-worn camera footage from two officers as well as surveillance footage of the incident. 

Evans’ attorney, Brandon Burrell, stated that he was experiencing the same issues regarding evidence as McCliggott. 

The prosecution said the reason is that sometimes video footage isn’t always filed in the right order. They stated that they would turn over the evidence as quickly as possible.

Judge Hertzfeld set a deadline for all evidence to be turned over by the end of the business day on April 3. She stated that the case was filed in October 2025 and that there was no reason the defense should not have received body-worn camera and surveillance footage.

Parties are slated to reconvene on May 29.

Judge Won’t Release Defendant Accused in Popeyes Stabbing

DC Superior Court Judge Heide Herrmann denied release for a stabbing defendant after she waived her preliminary hearing of the initial evidence on April 1.

Sarita Middleton, 45, is charged with two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon for her alleged involvement in a non-fatal stabbing that occurred at a Popeyes restaurant on the 1700 block of Columbia Road, NW on Feb. 11.

According to court documents, Middleton allegedly threatened a restaurant employee with a knife after they informed her that she could not eat there since they were closing. The manager attempted to disarm her and sustained a minor laceration to their arm. 

After Middleton waived her right to a preliminary hearing, her attorney, Russell Hairston, argued in favor of release. 

Hairston highlighted that Middleton has a steady job, a supportive family in the area, and lives far away from the crime scene. He requested supervised release with electronic monitoring.

The prosecutors argued that there was a serious concern for public safety due to the incident involving  strangers. They also expressed that her criminal history, including an attempted escape and Bail Reform Act (BRA) conviction, indicates she may not return to court once released.

Hairston reminded Judge Herrmann that Middleton’s danger to the community was resulted from mental health issues and that she now understands the importance of taking her medicine.

Judge Herrmann agreed that the nature of the offense is concerning and highlighted the prosecution’s strong evidence. She also said there is no guarantee that taking medication will stop this from happening again. 

As a result, Judge Herrmann decided that there are no conditions that will protect the community and that Middleton will be held without release. 

Parties are slated to reconvene on April 24.

Parties Want Carjacking Defendant Transferred From Virginia to DC

DC Superior Court Judge Andrea Hertzfeld heard a request for a carjacking defendant held in Virginia to be transferred to the DC Jail on April 1.  

Isaiah Barnes, 19, is charged with armed carjacking for his alleged involvement in an incident that took place at the 2000 block of Pennsylvania Avenue, SE on July 31, 2024. 

According to court documents, Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officers responded to a Citgo gas station where an armed carjacking had occurred. The victim informed MPD that Barnes reportedly opened his driver’s side door and pointed a black semi-automatic handgun at him as Barnes’ entered the car and drove off. 

At the hearing, Barnes’ attorney, Thomas Key, alerted parties that his client is currently held in Virginia . 

Key requested Judge Hertzfeld transfer Barnes to the DC Jail. The prosecution agreed.

Judge Hertzfeld told parties that she has no authority to have Barnes transferred to the DC Jail but she could ask the deputy of the jail in Virginia for permission. 

Additionally, Key explained to Judge Hertzfeld that he has received a plea offer from the prosecution but needs more time to let his client review it. No terms were mentioned in court.

Parties are slated to reconvene on May 4. 

Slowing Down Was ‘Too Little, Too Late,’ Judge Says in Triple Murder DUI Trial

DC Superior Court Judge Rainey Brandt denied a defense attorney’s motion for judgement of acquittal on March 31, arguing there is more than enough evidence for a reasonable jury to find her guilty.

Nakita Walker, 46, is on trial for three counts of second-degree murder, fleeing a law enforcement officer, and assault with a dangerous weapon for her alleged involvement in a fatal car crash, which killed Mohamed Kamara, 43, Jonathan Cabrera Mendez, 23, and Olvin Josue Torres Velasquez, 22. The incident occurred on Rock Creek Parkway, NW, on March 15, 2023.

Walker’s attorney, Albert Amissah, called an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) to testify. The EMT told Amissah he assisted in treating Walker at the scene. According to the EMT, Walker had an “altered mental state,” after the accident. “She was in pain,” he said. He testified Walker’s behavior could have been a result of a head injury from the crash. He said he didn’t smell any alcohol on Walker. 

On cross-examination, the EMT confirmed the language in the accident report, which specifies Walker was able to speak to EMS but was “clearly intoxicated.” 

On re-direct, the EMT stated his partner filed out the detailed incident report. He reiterated that he can’t say whether Walker’s altered mental state was because of alcohol intoxication or because of a head injury from the crash. “Both exhibit similar symptoms,” he said, and he didn’t see Walker drinking or look to see if there was any alcohol in her car because that’s not his responsibility. 

After dismissing the jury, parties discussed Amissah’s motion for judgment of acquittal.

“No reasonable jury would find [Walker] guilty,” Amissah asserted. He claimed there was no malice in her actions. According to Amissah, Walker was avoiding pedestrians, swerving, and even slowing down, indicating she was “exercising some type of caution.” 

Amissah further explained there were mitigating factors. For example, Walker was trying to rush home to get to her young son, who she claimed was left alone by her child’s father. In addition, Amissah said there was an exchange in the car with Walker’s boyfriend at the time which took her attention off the road, and her boyfriend allegedly had a gun. 

This was an accident, Amissah said, but it’s not second-degree murder. He claimed Walker was not reckless. For the assault with a dangerous weapon charge, Amissah contended Walker’s ex-boyfriend was the direct cause of the accident after inciting an argument with her. 

In response, the prosecutor said this is “one of the most clear cut cases” of second-degree murder she’s ever seen. She said there is no place in DC where driving 100 miles per hour is appropriate, showing recklessness. Speeding, driving under the influence, and fleeing a police officer are all conscious disregard for safety, the prosecutor insisted.

Walker was slowing down to 70 miles per hour, more than twice the speed limit, the prosecutor said. Also, she argued the evidence doesn’t show that the ex-boyfriend had a gun.

The prosecutor asked the court to deny the motion. 

According to Amissah, no one saw Walker drinking. No one can testify to her blood alcohol content at the time of the accident, only afterwards. “All you have is an assumption” that she was intoxicated at the time, he said. 

Amissah added, no one testified to smelling alcohol on Walker, seeing dilated eyes, or hearing slurred speech. He emphasized data from the crash expert shows Walker slowed down before the accident, showing she was trying to avoid it. 

Judge Brandt denied the motion to dismiss. She stated that testimony from multiple witnesses was more than enough for a reasonable jury to find Walker guilty. According to Judge Brandt, Walker’s toxicology report shows her blood alcohol content was .10, over two times the legal limit. 

For the assault with a dangerous weapon charge, the testimony from Walker’s ex-boyfriend is enough for a reasonable jury to find guilt, said Judge Brandt. According to the judge, he testified that wearing a seatbelt saved his life and reduced the injuries he sustained from the car crash. 

It doesn’t matter if Walker was trying to break or slow down because it was “clearly too little, too late,” said Judge Brandt. 

For the charge of fleeing a law enforcement officer, Judge Brandt referenced surveillance footage of Walker being signaled down by the officer, pulling over, and then side swiping the officer while driving away.  

Parties are slated to reconvene on April 1.

Prosecutor Claims Homicide Defendant Had ‘Deadly Intentions’

Both parties presented passionate opening statements in a homicide trial before DC Superior Court Judge Danya Dayson on April 2. 

Jamil Whitley, 38, is charged with first-degree premeditated murder while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, carrying a pistol without a license outside of a home or business, and unlawful possession of a firearm with a prior conviction greater than one year. These charges stem from his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of Kevin Redd, 32, that occurred on the 4700 block of Jay Street, NE on June 11, 2020. Redd sustained three gunshot wounds.

Before the jury was called, defense attorney Madalyn Harvey challenged the admissibility of body-worn camera footage from an officer who responded to the shooting. Harvey argued that the officer made statements in the video that would be harmful to Whitley if the jury heard them. Prosecutors played the video for Judge Dayson, who didn’t have an issue with its admissibility.

In their opening statement, prosecutors explained that Redd was intoxicated when a co-worker dropped him off at a Shell gas station near his home, at the 4300 block of Nannie Helen Burroughs Avenue, NE. Whitley was also at the Shell with a car full of friends at this same time. Whitley exited the car to make a purchase at the Shell when he met Redd for the first time. 

After making a purchase at the Shell, Whitley left in the car with his friends, returning 13 minutes later with “deadly intentions,” alone, armed with a firearm, and in a different car, which belonged to his girlfriend. Redd, who was still at the Shell, was beckoned over to Whitley’s car and entered the car before it drove away, said prosecutors.

Prosecutors continued, stating that Whitley drove to an alley, shot Redd, and “left him to die,” describing it as a “premeditated act.” 

Whitley’s attorney, James Brockway, said that prosecutors won’t evidence that Whitley shot Redd because he only “gave him a ride.” According to Brockway, Redd and Whitley met in the Shell, and Redd asked Whitley’s friends for some marijuana. Whitley told Redd he would get him some and returned 13 minutes later in a different car to give Redd the drug. 

Brockway stated that Whitley did not shoot Redd, and a gun was never found. Additionally, prosecutors will provide no witness testimony to support the murder during the course of the trial. Brockway said that Whitley was accused of murder for doing a small favor and “didn’t ask for any of this.”

Following opening arguments, prosecutors called the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officer who responded to the shooting. The prosecution showed the jury two satellite images of the neighborhood where the incident took place, and the officer circled the Shell mentioned in opening arguments, and the alley where the shooting occurred.

Prosecutors also played a video from the officer’s body-worn camera, depicting the officer arriving on the scene and finding Redd in the alley. According to the officer, she searched the scene for physical evidence and witnesses and talked with two individuals who lived on the block.

The prosecution then called Whitley’s son’s mother to testify. Although the witness moved to Georgia, police there visited her on behalf of the MPD in 2021. Prosecutors played body-worn camera footage for the jury of the witness from 2021 when she identified Whitley in a video of him exiting a car. The witness said upon seeing the video she “was in shock” and thought “did something happen to my son’s dad?”

On cross-examination, Harvey pointed out that the prosecution funded the witness’ return to DC in 2021 and now for this trial, including paying for her plane tickets and lodging.

The prosecution clarified with the witness that the free trip was no incentive to testify as she did not want to be there.

A communication office employee from the MPD who made a compilation video also testified. The video surveillance footage of someone MPD officers considered to be a “person of interest.”

The video is then promoted on social media in the hopes that someone from the public will be able to provide MPD with more information about the individual. The MPD employee said “with a case like this” they “would have promoted it as much as possible.”

Harvey revealed through cross-examination that the surveillance videos for the compilations were selected by MPD officers and the people in the videos that were not considered to be of interest were not shared with the public.

Prosecutors also called Redd’s father, who identified his son from a photograph that prosecutors showed the jury.

Parties are scheduled to reconvene on April 6.

Judge Revokes Defendant’s Probation After Guilty Plea in New Kidnapping Case 

A defendant had his probation revoked by DC Superior Court Judge Michael Ryan on April 3. 

Kaevon Sutton, 25, was found guilty by a jury on March 23, 2023, of carrying a pistol without a license outside a home or business for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of Aujee Tyler, 22, on March 19, 2018 on the 3500 block of Stanton Road, SE. Sutton was acquitted of first-degree murder and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence. 

During the hearing, the prosecutor informed Judge Ryan that Sutton is being held for another matter; he pleaded guilty to two counts of kidnapping on March 6. According to the prosecutor, he is scheduled to be sentenced in September, between 14-to-17-and-a-half years of imprisonment. 

The prosecutor asked Judge Ryan to revoke Sutton’s probation and sentence him to time served in the present case.

Terrence Austin, Sutton’s attorney, requested Judge Ryan terminate Sutton’s probation. Austin said Sutton is facing a significant sentence for the other matter and there is no point in sentencing him to time served.

Judge Ryan agreed with the prosecutor, revoked Sutton’s probation in this case, and re-sentenced him only to the time he already served. Sutton will remain held in the kidnapping case pending sentencing.

No further dates have been set.