Defendant Sentenced to 5 Years in Prison for Shooting His Stepson

DC Superior Court Judge Jason Park sentenced a domestic shooting defendant at the midpoint of the guidelines on Aug. 28.

Bruce Lee, 47, pleaded guilty on June 26 to assault with intent to kill for shooting his stepson, who sustained a gunshot wound to his back, on Oct. 16, 2025, on the 400 block of Douglas Street, NE.

In court, the prosecutor requested Lee serve seven years in prison, a sentence at the top of the guidelines.

The incident stemmed from a mutual fight between Lee and his stepson. However, the prosecutor emphasized that after the fight ended, the stepson attempted to leave the apartment when Lee retrieved a firearm from another room, returned, and shot his stepson in the back from across the room. Lee then left without rendering any aid to the victim, asserted the prosecutor.

Judge Park asked the prosecutor about the extent of the victim’s injuries. The prosecutor said the victim spent a short period of time in the hospital before he was released with no long term physical effects.

The prosecutor added that Lee’s actions endangered his wife, his stepson’s girlfriend, and her toddler, all of whom witnessed the offense.

Shawn Sukumar, Lee’s attorney, asked for a sentence at the bottom of the guidelines of three years in prison. Sukumar described a lengthy and complicated relationship between Lee and his stepson and Lee’s wife and his stepson. Both Lee and his wife experienced verbal abuse and physical violence from his stepson, Sukumar said.

According to Sukumar, Lee’s stepson suffers from mental health issues that are exacerbated by inconsistent medication and treatment. The family struggled with how to approach the victim when his mental health affected his behavior.

Sukumar acknowledged that in “unusual circumstances,” Lee “made a horrible decision.” As the “grown up,” Sukumar said Lee should have handled the situation better.

Lee’s family never knew him as a violent person, Sukumar emphasized, and Lee had no prior history of violence.

Sukumar highlighted that Lee is a hard worker who was gainfully employed for the last 20 years. A sentence at the bottom of the guidelines would allow Lee “a learning opportunity” and rehabilitation, Sukumar concluded.

Judge Park emphasized the violent nature of Lee’s conduct but acknowledged he did not plan the offense beforehand. In addition, the judge credited Lee for his early acceptance of responsibility and lack of violent history.

Judge Park sentenced Lee to five years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. Lee must register as a gun offender in DC upon his release. The prosecution did not request the judge order Lee to stay away from the victim.

No further dates were set.

Indictment Date Extended After Failed Plea Deal in a Homicide

Parties agreed to a 27 day extension of the nine month indictment deadline on Aug. 28 in a murder case that failed to resolve in an anticipated plea agreement the week before.

In a brief hearing before DC Superior Court Judge Neal Kravitz the judge set a new arraignment date for Shawn Conway. Conway, 50, is charged with second-degree murder while armed for his alleged involvement in the fatal stabbing of Jermaine Foster, 34, during a melee on the 2000 block of 14th Street, NW about 3 a.m. on Sept.13, 2025.

According to court documents, a large group of revelers arrived at the scene when shortly after a confrontation ensued. Police arrived in the midst of the fight and located Foster, mortally wounded, stabbed six times including a strike to the heart. He was pronounced dead at a local hospital. Three others who tried to break up the fight sustained non-fatal injuries.

The case appeared headed for resolution on Aug. 21 after Conway originally agreed to a prosecution plea offer to serve 18-to-22 years in prison. However, the deal fell apart.

At issue was an apparent mismatch between what the defendant said in court to Judge Kravitz and what the prosecutor claimed in his proffer, or statement of the facts.

He maintained had the case gone to trial witness accounts and surveillance video would have proved that Conway committed murder leaving his bleeding victim on the sidewalk.

However, when Judge Kravitz asked Conway if he agreed with the prosecution’s narrative, he provided a different account.

“Did you stab Jermaine Foster at 2:25 a.m.?” asked Kravitz.

Conway affirmed the action, with a qualification, “I meant to stab him; I didn’t mean to kill him.” The action, he said, “was out of rage, anger.” That raised Judge Kravitz’ concern that it could be considered a crime of passion and possibly a mitigating factor.

“I’m kind of at a loss,” said the judge. “I don’t know how I can find there were no mitigating factors.”

The prosecutor was incredulous saying, “[The victim] was on the ground defenseless while people are trying to stop [Conway].” He insisted the facts supported the plea.

Judge Kravitz said, it’s up to the defendant to admit the stabbing was a murder and not something lesser.

“You misunderstand my role,” said Judge Kravitz, obviously displeased with the prosecutor.

“Shaking your head in disagreement is not helpful or professional,” said the judge. “It may well be that the facts support second-degree murder, but it’s not in the proffer.”

The debate was timely because the prosecution’s plea offer was set to expire the day of the hearing.

However, defense attorney Madelyn Harvey indicated at the current hearing that she and the prosecutor were in discussions about a counter offer.

Judge Kravitz set the next hearing for Sept. 19.

Case Acquitted: Homicide Case Rests ‘on the Shoulders of a Vulnerable Child,’ Defense Asserts

Editor’s note: Robert Baskerville was acquitted of all charges by a jury on Sept. 15, 2026.

The defense and prosecution disputed the credibility of a six-year-old boy who witnessed his father’s death in a trial before DC Superior Court Judge Todd Edelman on Aug. 25.

Robert Baskerville, 33, is charged with conspiracy, first-degree premeditated murder while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and carrying a pistol without a license. The charges stem from Baskerville’s alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 28-year-old Darron Holmes on April 16, 2022 on the 1200 block of Southern Avenue, SE. Holmes died from four gunshot wounds to his neck, wrist, butt, and ear.

For her alleged involvement in the same offense, Baskerville’s co-defendant, Tamera Brown, 30, is charged with conspiracy, first-degree premeditated murder while armed, two counts of threatening to kidnap or injure a person, and obstructing justice.

The co-defendants’ cases were severed and Brown’s trial is scheduled to begin on Oct. 5.

In opening statements for Baskerville’s case, the prosecution detailed the events that they claim ended with Holmes “gunned down” in front of his two children.

Brown and Holmes were married from 2019 to 2022 and had two sons together, who were three- and six-years-old at the time of Holmes’ death. The prosecutor noted that, “divorces aren’t easy” and often result in “bitterness” between former spouses.

A visitation agreement indicated that Brown would receive the children on the weekends, said the prosecutor. However, for unclear reasons, the visitation was not implemented and Brown was upset.

The day of the incident, Brown tried to pick up her children from Holmes. The prosecutor said when Holmes did not let her, Brown banged on his door and demanded to see her sons. According to the prosecutor, in a phone call, Brown’s former mother-in-law attempted to resolve the situation peacefully.

In the call, the prosecutor alleged Brown threatened to harm or kill Holmes if she did not receive the children. Brown’s former mother-in-law will reportedly testify about the threats she overheard.

Based on a call from Brown’s former mother-in-law, officers responded to a report of domestic violence at Holmes’ residence. When officers arrived, Brown had left, but they spoke with Holmes, who the prosecution argued appeared calm in body-worn camera footage.

The prosecution explained that Brown went to Baskerville’s residence, who was her boyfriend at the time. Brown picked up Baskerville, who was armed, and they drove back to Holmes’ residence, the prosecution claimed.

When Baskerville and Brown arrived, Holmes brought the children downstairs and there was a violent altercation in which Holmes put his hands on Brown. The prosecution alleged that Baskerville then fired four shots at a close range and fled the scene with Brown and the two boys.

Holmes’ friend, who was in his apartment, mistook the gunfire for a gate slamming shut, prosecutors said. The friend then heard children crying, went downstairs, and found her close friend bleeding out on the sidewalk.

After the shooting, Brown went home, then to her father’s house, before her father drove the two of them to the police station. The prosecution asserted that body-worn camera footage will demonstrate that Brown was not bleeding and had no visible serious wounds when she arrived at the station.

The prosecution informed jurors that a forensic interviewer questioned both children after the incident. The now-10-year-old child will testify that “daddy attacked mommy” then “daddy got shot” by a “random guy,” prosecutors claimed. They elaborated that the child will report that the shooter looked like “two,” which they allege is Baskerville because his nickname is 200.

The prosecution asked jurors to find Baskerville guilty on all four counts.

Baskerville’s attorney, Christen Philips, asserted there was no plan to kill Holmes, her client was “nowhere near” the shooting, and is innocent.

According to Philips, Baskerville received a call from Brown the day of the incident in which she was crying. The two spent the day together until Holmes called Brown and told her to return for the kids because he changed his mind.

At Holmes’ residence, Baskerville stayed in the car that was parked on the other side of the building, Philips claimed. Baskerville heard screams, gunshots, and tears, Philips said, before Brown ran back to the car with her sons, and they drove away.

Later that day, Brown was alone with her children and family when Philips claimed, “decisions are made.”

The prosecution’s case rests “on the shoulders of a vulnerable child” who reported “what he was told to say to protect his mother,” Philips asserted.

Philips argued the evidence does not match the child’s story. For example, Philips said he will testify that the shooter stood far away and shot once. However, the evidence proves the shooter stood close and shot four times, Philips noted.

In addition, Philips emphasized that the only reliable adult witness, Holmes’ friend, will reportedly testify that she only witnessed Brown exit the car and that the driver remained in the car.

Philips claimed Brown fired the shots in self-defense. The evidence will show Brown’s DNA under Holmes’ fingernails and Holmes’ DNA on Brown’s glasses that he knocked off her face, Philips highlighted.

The trial is scheduled to resume on Aug. 26.

Judge Denies Release for Defendant Accused of Metro Bus Mass Shooting

DC Superior Court Judge Jason Park denied a mass shooting defendant’s request for release on Aug. 21.

Anthony Del Cid-Morales, 18, faces 69 charges, including assault with intent to kill while armed, aggravated assault while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and misdemeanor sex abuse, for his alleged involvement in a mass shooting that occurred at a bus stop at the intersection of 16th Street and Missouri Avenue, NW on Jan. 22. Five individuals sustained injuries during the incident.

All charges have enhancements for being committed against Metro Transit passengers.

During the hearings on Aug. 20 and 21, parties questioned the lead detective regarding the investigation.

According to the detective, Del Cid-Morales was aboard a metro bus when a group of almost 15 Latino youth boarded. One of the girls in the group sat next to Del Cid-Morales when he allegedly touched her buttocks, which caused a disagreement between Del Cid-Morales and the group.

The detective claimed the group attempted to get off the bus through the back door to avoid growing tension at 16th Street and Missouri Avenue, NW. Meanwhile, the detective claimed, Del Cid-Morales walked to the front of the bus, racked his gun, and jumped off to shoot at the group, also striking bystanders, before fleeing the scene.

O’Sullivan argued Del Cid-Morales acted in self-defense, citing grand jury testimony from one of the victims in the group who claimed the group threatened to beat Del Cid-Morales to death. O’Sullivan further highlighted evidence that officers from the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) recovered a knife, machete, and imitation firearm from nearby yards, which were allegedly linked to the group.

O’Sullivan suggested the group could’ve been a gang, citing that Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) – a Latino gang – members are known to carry around machetes for protection.

“He [the defendant] had a gun on him, and we’re not trying to say he’s a gang member,” the prosecutor retaliated.

Following the detective’s testimony, O’Sullivan argued Del Cid-Morales was “significantly outnumbered” by the group in the bus. He further argued that Del Cid-Morales feared for his safety, highlighting the presence of the imitation firearm. “Someone who’s seeing the object can perceive it as a real gun,” O’Sullivan insisted.

However, the prosecution disagreed and argued Del Cid-Morales provoked the group by following them off the bus and using deadly force. “There is no reason why he needs to be getting off at that bus stop,” the prosecutor stated.

Judge Park said evidence at this stage in the case doesn’t point in favor of a self-defense argument, stating there is no evidence that the knives and imitation firearm were ever brandished against the defendant before he shot at the group. He further argued the defendant’s decision to get off the bus after the group went against his argument that he feared for his life. “If he was in fear he wouldn’t have left the bus,” said Judge Park.

Judge Park found no combination of release conditions could guarantee the community’s safety, and ordered Del Cid-Morales be held pending further proceedings.

A trial date was scheduled for Jan. 10, 2028.

Parties are slated to reconvene Dec. 17.

Judge Orders Full Mental Evaluation for Fatal Shooting Suspect

At the request of the defense, DC Superior Court Judge Neal Kravitz ordered a full mental competency evaluation for a homicide defendant on Aug. 25.

Hakeem Jones, 28, is charged with first-degree murder while armed for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 25-year-old Jamillah Gales on April 21 on the 600 block of Kenyon Street, NW. Gales suffered from two gunshot wounds to her back.

According to court records, Gales had a two-year-old son that she left at a friend’s house prior to her death.

At the hearing, parties discussed an Aug. 14 report from the Department of Behavioral Health (DBH) that found Jones mentally competent to stand trial. Jones must understand the charges against him and be able to assist in his defense.

The prosecutor had no objections to the report. However, Jones’ attorney, Hannah Claudio, contested the findings and asked Judge Kravitz to order a full competency evaluation at Saint Elizabeths Hospital.

According to Claudio, the report was based on a 30 minute video visit and a narrow subset of Jones’ records. To determine his mental competency, Claudio asserted that more observations were necessary.

Claudio added that Jones was in solitary confinement at the DC Jail and asserted his competency was deteriorating as a result.

The prosecution had no position on Claudio’s request.

Judge Kravitz ordered Jones undergo a full mental competency evaluation at Saint Elizabeths Hospital. The parties are scheduled to reconvene for a mental observation hearing on Sept. 25.

Claudio said the defense wanted to proceed with Jones’ preliminary hearing before the competency issue is resolved, which parties scheduled for Sept. 15.

Bench Warrant Issued for DC Murder Suspect Held in Virginia

Twenty-three-year old Na’eem Butler, a suspected murderer. failed to appear for a probation revocation hearing on Aug. 21 because he is jailed on another matter in Loudoun County, Virginia.

As a result, DC Superior Court Judge Neal Kravitz issued an arrest warrant pending the resolution of Butler’s Virginia case because that’s the “best way” to proceed. If there’s no probable cause against Butler, the warrant would be dropped.

However, prosecutors wanted Butler’s release revoked not only for murder but the rearrest on new charges.

Butler was originally charged with second-degree murder while armed and possession of a firearm in a crime of violence for allegedly shooting Diamonte Lewis, 24, on the 900 block of U Street, NW on Oct. 3, 2023 during Howard University’s homecoming.

When police arrived they found Lewis had been shot six times in front of Nellie’s Sports Bar.

A prosecution motion filed on Aug. 6, maintains Butler and his co-defendant, Ashton Inabinet, 19, both from Virginia, were released over the prosecutor’s objection even though probable cause was found that they committed murder.

They have since been indicted and an Oct. 26 jury trial is pending. Meanwhile, according to the motion, Butler has been re-arrested for felony kidnapping, vandalism and assault of a family member.

“[T] he rearrest of Mr. Butler …represents a change in circumstances such that a

change in his bond status is warranted,” continues the prosecutor’s memo.

The prosecutor argued in court that the rearrest was a violation of Butler’s release. “It’s very clear that it was a domestic violence incident,” she said.

Butler’s attorney, David Knight, said revocation would be premature based on the fact no probable cause has been found for the Virginia case.

“There are inconsistencies in what the complaining witness reports,” said Knight because the alleged victim later admitted to police she intended to strike Butler. Knight continued that Butler wants to appear in DC and there’s no reason he wouldn’t.

Over the prosecutor’s objection, Judge Kravitz said that until the situation in Virginia is clarified he had “no legal authority,” to cancel Butler’s release.

The judge rescheduled the next release hearing for Sept. 4.

‘It Will Always Be About Control,’ Remarks Judge in Sentencing Domestic Stabbing Defendant

DC Superior Court Judge Rainey Brandt emphasized that a repeat domestic violence defendant’s actions stemmed from his desire for control at a sentencing on Aug. 21.

James Callen, 42, was convicted by a jury on June 11 of assault with intent to kill while armed, assault with a dangerous weapon, aggravated assault knowingly while armed, and assault with significant bodily injury while armed for stabbing his then-girlfriend on July 13, 2024 on the 1600 block of Morris Road, SE. The charges face an aggravating factor of being committed while Callen was on release for another case.

The jury also convicted Callen of three counts of felony contempt for violating a stay-away order by contacting the victim in September 2024, January 2025, and February 2025.

At sentencing, the victim said, “I’m a survivor of the attempted murder committed” by Callen. The victim said Callen also used “his bare hands as weapons” to send her to the hospital several times.

The victim described her continued post-traumatic stress disorder, nightmares, flashbacks, and panic attacks. When the victim crosses paths with men who resemble Callen, she said she feels fearful and anxious, despite knowing he is incarcerated.

“You are a survivor,” Judge Brandt told the victim. “It’s very brave for you to come up and tell your story in front of strangers with the amount of strength and grace that you just did.”

The victim “walked through a storm,” Judge Brandt said, and “the jury clearly thought so.”

The prosecution asked for a total sentence of 23-and-a-half years in prison for Callen. They acknowledged that their request was close to the top of the guidelines, but said it was warranted by the “horrifying” nature and circumstances of the offense.

According to prosecutors, the victim sustained numerous assaults from Callen throughout their relationship that culminated in him stabbing her repeatedly because she expressed not wanting to live with him. In the months following the stabbing, prosecutors said Callen called the victim more than 80 times from the DC Jail, despite a court order to not contact her.

The offense was not the first time Callen stabbed a romantic partner, emphasized prosecutors. In 2019, Callen was convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon after stabbing his wife.

The prosecution expressed hope that a lengthy term of imprisonment would allow Callen to reevaluate his choices.

Wole Falodun, Callen’s attorney, said Callen’s “worst conduct is part of who he is, it is not the entirety of who he is.” Falodun emphasized Callen’s work history, sobriety during times of stability, and that he once completed supervision successfully.

Falodun requested Callen serve nine-and-a-half years in prison total for the assault charges with the time for the contempt charges to run concurrently to the fullest extent permitted by the law. For the offenses committed during release, Falodun asked for the minimum sentence.

Callen maintained his innocence and chose not to speak because of his pending motion for a new trial and right to appeal his conviction, Falodun said.

Judge Brandt commended Falodun and said his written sentencing memorandum was one of the best she received in the recent past. Falodun articulated “the duality of Mr. Callen,” Judge Brandt said.

“Mr. Callen hasn’t always had an easy life,” Judge Brandt acknowledged, but said his “life has been peppered with this thing called choice.”

Judge Brandt described the amount of Callen’s prior domestic violence convictions as “absolutely staggering.” Callen committed the offenses against women he purportedly cared about, noted the judge. Judge Brandt said care, concern, and love should not be mistaken for control.

“It has always been, and it will always be about control,” Judge Brandt emphasized.

Judge Brandt pointed to Callen’s disregard for the court order to not contact the victim as further evidence of his desire for control. “You’ve got to control the situation,” Judge Brandt told Callen.

Judge Brandt sentenced Callen to 17 years in prison for assault with intent to kill, 10 years for aggravated assault, and five years for assault with significant bodily injury. Assault with a dangerous weapon is a lesser-included offense, and therefore merged with the other charges for sentencing.

For each offense committed during release, the judge sentenced Callen to two years, to run concurrent with each other, but consecutive to the assault sentences.

Callen received 18 months in prison for each contempt charge, concurrent to each other, but consecutive to the other sentences.

In total, Callen will serve 20-and-a-half years in prison, followed by five years of supervised release. He must also stay away and not contact the victim.

No further dates were set.

Homicide Defendant Pleads Not Guilty at Arraignment, Co-Defendant Ordered to Undergo Mental Evaluation

A homicide defendant pleaded not guilty and was denied release on Aug. 21 by DC Superior Court Judge Jason Park. His co-defendant was ordered to undergo mental evaluations.

Corey Noble, 28, and Zion Humphrey, 26, are charged with first-degree murder while armed, attempted robbery while armed, and two counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence for their alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 25-year-old Tre’Von Norman on March 20, 2025 on the 2400 block of Elvans Road, SE.

During the hearing, Noble’s attorney, Madalyn Harvey, requested he be screened for competency concerns. Judge Park granted the request, and ordered Noble be arraigned at a later date, if he’s found competent.

Jesse Winograd, Humphrey’s attorney, alerted the court of his intent to plead not guilty to all charges, and asserted his constitutional rights, including the right to a speedy trial.

Winograd also requested Humphrey be released, arguing Humphrey is not charged as a shooter, but rather an aider and abettor– someone who knowingly assisted someone else to commit a crime.

“There are no allegations that [Humphrey] ever had a gun, or knew the gun was going to come out,” Winograd stated, adding the prosecution has claimed he “somehow lured the victim to the area,” before it turned into a “botched robbery.”

According to Winograd, prosecutors connected Humphrey to the incident because of text messages, despite none of them referring to a gun, robbery, or the watch that the suspects allegedly wanted to steal from Norman.

Winograd further argued that any statements made to police by Humphrey shouldn’t bear significant weight due to Humphrey being in a hospital, “halfway out of it, and trying to remember” after he was shot.

He requested Humphrey be released to continue working at an HVAC company, where he was employed before his arrest.

However, the prosecution objected to the request, claiming the reason Norman went to the incident location was because Humphrey told him to meet him there. According to the prosecution, Norman and Humphrey knew each other growing up, and Humphrey reached out to Norman about watches he was selling on Instagram.

“Humphrey is the reason [Norman] was there that day,” the prosecution insisted. The prosecution further argued that cell site data put Humphrey in the general area of the incident location at the time of the murder.

According to the prosecution, Noble, who they claim was the shooter, “armed himself and masked up simultaneously” as Humphrey texted Norman about the car he was in and where he parked.

“The community is safer with him incarcerated,” the prosecutor stated.

Judge Park agreed with the prosecution, and ordered Humphrey continue to be held pending further proceedings.

Parties are slated to reconvene Aug. 28.

Defendant Accepts Plea Deal for Traffic Shooting, Judge Denies Release

DC Superior Court Judge Michael Ryan denied release for a non-fatal shooting defendant who accepted a plea deal in a hearing on Aug. 21.

Lafonzo Williams, 58, was initially charged with assault with intent to kill while armed, aggravated assault while armed, and two counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence. The charges stemmed from his involvement in a shooting on May 23 at the intersection of Georgia and Missouri Avenues, NW.

At the hearing, Williams pleaded guilty to aggravated assault and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence. In exchange, prosecutors dismissed the remaining arrest charges and will not seek an indictment with additional charges related to the offense.

The parties also agreed to a sentence of five years in prison for each charge, to run concurrently, followed by three years of supervised release. The agreed-upon sentence is subject to Judge Ryan’s approval at sentencing.

Without the agreement, aggravated assault carries a maximum of 10 years in prison and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence carries a maximum of 15 years in prison.

If the case had proceeded to trial, the prosecutor said the evidence would have shown that around 4 p.m. on the day of the offense, Williams drove his significant other’s vehicle on Georgia Avenue, NW. Williams and the victim, who drove his girlfriend’s vehicle, had a verbal altercation in which they both yelled at each other.

When both vehicles stopped at a red light, Williams exited his vehicle, retrieved a pistol, and fired eight rounds at the driver’s side door of the vehicle the victim drove. The shots struck the victim and he was transported to a hospital. Williams acted intentionally and without legal justification, concluded the prosecutor.

After her client accepted the plea deal, Elizabeth Weller, Williams’ attorney, asked for his release to home confinement with limited permission to work while he awaits sentencing. Weller said Williams’ family is reliant on his income and he is the primary person responsible for his family’s affairs.

With Williams’ incarcerated it has been “a real struggle for them, since he’s not home and able to contribute,” Weller said. If released, Weller noted Williams could return to his work as a mechanic.

The past fall, Weller said Williams got married and the couple had not yet combined their finances. According to Weller, Williams’ attempts at the DC Jail were unsuccessful.

Weller also emphasized that Williams’ criminal history was dated and he did not plan or organize the shooting.

The prosecutor noted Williams would not pose a flight risk, but opposed his release. The law and particular statute state that Williams should remain detained, the prosecutor asserted, and the defense had not provided clear and convincing evidence to rebut that presumption.

“It’s dated but it can’t be discounted,” the prosecutor argued about Williams’ criminal history. He added that the offense occurred in a split-second, provoked by a disagreement, in broad daylight, and at a busy intersection.

The prosecutor sympathized with Williams’ financial circumstances but said the issue should be resolved with the jail.

“I don’t have the basis for release, I’m sorry,” said Judge Ryan, although he expressed that he wanted Williams’ to have the chance to organize his affairs.

Based on the facts of the case, Judge Ryan found no clear and convincing evidence that Williams could safely be released to the community.

“I have to follow the law,” concluded Judge Ryan but expressed hope that Williams could establish a line of communication at the jail to resolve his affairs.

Williams’ sentencing is scheduled for Oct. 23.

Defendant Accused of 2023 Stabbing Rejects Plea Deal, Trial Set for 2028

A defendant accused of stabbing his cousin’s then-boyfriend rejected a plea deal and scheduled a trial before DC Superior Court Judge Michael Ryan on Aug. 21.

Herbert Young, 43, is charged with assault with intent to kill while armed, aggravated assault knowingly while armed, and assault with a dangerous weapon, all against a senior citizen. In addition Young is charged with carrying a dangerous weapon outside a home or business. The charges stem from his alleged involvement in a stabbing on Feb. 4, 2023 on the 2500 block of N Street, SE. The victim sustained one wound to his neck, eight to his torso, and was in critical condition.

According to court records, the victim is Young’s cousin’s then-boyfriend.

At the hearing, Young’s attorney, Hannah Claudio, informed Judge Ryan that plea negotiations with the prosecution were unsuccessful. As a result, Claudio requested to set a trial date.

The prosecutor placed on the record that if Young pleaded guilty to unarmed assault with intent to kill, the prosecution would dismiss all greater and remaining charges in the case. The plea deal carried no restrictions on the sentence the parties could request.

After Judge Ryan confirmed with Young that he had enough time to discuss the offer with his attorneys, he found his rejection knowing and voluntary.

The parties scheduled Young’s trial for Jan. 18, 2028 and are scheduled to reconvene for a trial readiness hearing on Nov. 17, 2027.

Murder Co-Defendants Reject Plea Deal, Opt for Trial

A pair of suspects declined a plea offer in connection to a homicide, opting for a trial in a hearing before DC Superior Court Judge Danya Dayson on Aug. 14.

Kevin Hider, 21, is charged with murder while armed and committing a robbery for his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting of 28-year-old Kenneth Barksdale on Dec. 16, 2023 on the 1200 block of 44th Place, SE. Barksdale sustained two gunshot wounds to his arm and abdomen.

HIder’s co-defendant, Eric Sheffield, 22, faces an eleven count indictment in the same incident for first-degree felony murder with aggravating circumstances, conspiracy assault with intent to commit robbery while armed, unauthorized use of a vehicle in a crime of violence, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence while armed, two counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, first-degree murder while armed, carrying a firearm during a crime of violence, carrying a pistol without a license outside a home or business.

D’Andre Montgomery, 20, was initially charged with first-degree murder in Barksdale’s killing but a jury found him guilty of conspiracy, and second-degree murder while armed, and unauthorized use of a vehicle during a crime of violence on May 26.

During the joint hearing both Hider, represented by Lisbeth Sapirstein, and Sheffield,counseled by Nathaniel Mensah, rejected an offer to plead guilty to second-degree murder in lieu of an indictment on greater charges. Under the deal, Hider would have faced a sentence of 14-to-21 years in prison. Sheffield’s term would have ranged from 11-to-14 years in prison.

After Judge Dayson queried the defendants about whether they fully understood the plea they said they discussed the matter with their lawyers and answered in the affirmative. Meanwhile, Sheffield indicated his intention to try and sever his case from Hider’s.

The next hearing in the case is scheduled for Oct. 23. The trial date is set for Aug. 16, 2027.

Teen Pleads Guilty to Murder, Two Sexual Assaults

An 18-year-old defendant accepted a plea deal for a murder and two unrelated sexual assault cases in a hearing before DC Superior Court Judge Danya Dayson on Aug. 14.

Javier Montgomery faced charges of first-degree murder in the killing of Jermaine Durbin, 17, on the 2300 block of Washington Place, NE on Oct. 3,2025. A Metropolitan Police Department officer responding to the scene became suspicious when he saw an individual running away wearing a black ski mask. Surveillance video captured the suspect brandishing a weapon and engaging in a scuffle with the victim.

Witness tips and a report from a former girlfriend of Montgomery’s confirmed she received several calls the night of the murder claiming that Montgomery had shot and killed someone.

In another incident on Sept. 5, 2025, police say a female victim reported that a suspect on a lime scooter pulled up to the woman, pointed a gun at her and ordered her to take off her shirt and bra, “proceeding to grope the [woman’s breasts] and then grabbed [her vagina].” The assault occurred on the 1800 block of Rhode Island, NE.

On Oct.1,2025, MPD officers from the sexual assault unit received a call that a suspect riding a lime colored scooter confronted a female victim on the 3900 block of 7th Street NE near the Brookland Metro station. The suspect said, “I’m about to rob you. I want all your stuff.”

At which point the victim surrendered a Louis Vuitton bag containing her wallet. As the attack continued the suspect forced the victim to the ground, pointed a gun at her head and demanded she perform oral sex on him. The episode lasted two minutes and was interrupted when a passerby startled the suspect and he fled.

During the hearing the prosecutor argued that had Montgomery’s cases come to trial he would have been found guilty on all counts. To each of the infractions, Montgomery acknowledged guilt by simply saying, “Yes, ma’am.”

Judge Dayson asked Montgomery if he and his attorney, Carrie Waletz, had reviewed the plea agreement and understood that the defendant was giving up his rights to a trial and to test the evidence in his cases. He affirmed his choices.

The three incidents were resolved by parties entering into an agreement which stipulates a sentencing range with the judge’s approval. Otherwise, the plea can be withdrawn.

For the murder, the range is 12-to-18 years. The sexual assault cases carries a potential 12-to-15 years in jail.

Sentencing is scheduled for Jan. 15, 2027.

‘I Had Trusted You for More Than 10 Years,’ Victim Writes to Domestic Stabbing Defendant

DC Superior Court Judge Jennifer Di Toro sentenced a domestic stabbing defendant to a probationary sentence with suspended prison time at a hearing on Aug. 18.

Daquan Evans, 28, pleaded guilty on June 16 to assault with a dangerous weapon for his involvement in a domestic stabbing offense that occurred on May 1 on the 2100 block of First Street, SW. The victim sustained two stab wounds to his shoulder and back.

At sentencing, both the prosecutor and Evans’ attorney, Christopher Young, described the incident as complicated.

The prosecutor read a written impact statement from the victim that noted his intimate and sexual relationship with Evans. “You knew me,” the victim wrote to Evans, “I had trusted you for more than 10 years.”

In the statement, the victim wondered if Evans’ childhood trauma followed him into adulthood but emphasized that he did not cause Evans’ past pain. The victim wrote to Evans that he felt “compassion for the child you were, without excusing the man you became.”

“You stabbed me in the arm and then in the back,” the victim’s statement said, but emphasized that “the physical wounds were only the beginning.”

The prosecutor noted that Evans stabbed a longtime romantic partner, someone who trusted him and knew him well, and that the victim no longer felt safe in his home. As a result, the prosecutor requested Evans serve 18 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release.

Young highlighted that Evans had no criminal history, accepted responsibility through a plea deal early in his case, and understood the severity of his actions.

“He did what he did, he understands what he did,” Young asserted.

Young noted that when Evans committed the offense, he was in town from New York on a weekend visit. Evans had already served almost four months in the DC Jail, Young emphasized, and asked for a probationary sentence he could serve in New York where he had a job lined up.

“He’s been punished,” and “probation is not a cake walk,” Young said.

“I take full responsibility,” Evans said. “I was wrong for taking matters into my own hands.”

Evans expressed his desire to be a productive member of society. “I’m not a criminal, I’m not a flight risk,” he declared. If Judge Di Toro did not trust Evans to return to New York, he said he would stay in a DC shelter.

“That person was genuinely harmed,” emphasized Judge Di Toro. She sentenced Evans to 18 months in prison, all suspended but the time he already served, with 12 months of probation. The judge allowed Evans to transfer his probation to New York but reminded him that he must remain in DC until the transfer is complete.

In addition, Evans must complete a mental health assessment, follow treatment recommendations, enroll in an anger management course, and stay away from the victim.

No further dates were set.

Stabbing Defendant Plans to Review Plea Deal With Mental Health Specialist

DC Superior Court Judge Neal Kravitz and the prosecutor allowed a stabbing defendant more time to consider a plea deal with the assistance of a mental health specialist at a hearing on Aug. 17.

Corey Bridges, 32, is charged with assault with intent to kill while armed, aggravated assault knowingly while armed, assault with significant bodily injury while armed, assault with a dangerous weapon, threat to kidnap or injure a person, and tampering with physical evidence. The charges stem from his alleged involvement in a stabbing on June 7, 2025 on the 1400 block of Morse Street, NE. The victim sustained multiple lacerations to their neck and bled severely.

Judge Kravitz noted at the start of the hearing that he received paperwork of Bridges’ intent to accept an Alford plea deal from prosecutors. The judge explained that under an Alford plea, Bridges would maintain his innocence, but admit that the prosecution had enough evidence to prove his guilt.

Theodore Shaw, Bridges’ attorney, said the defense needed more time to review the plea deal with Bridges before his acceptance. Shaw expressed concerns about Bridges ability to communicate with counsel and understand the process. According to Shaw, the defense planned for a Mental Health Specialist for the Public Defender Service (PDS) to meet with Bridges and explain the plea.

Judge Kravitz asked if the prosecution would keep the offer open. The prosecutor noted it was not the first occasion that Bridges’ defense team delayed plea discussions to appoint a mental health specialist. He expressed concern that parties would not resolve the case given the same approach.

The judge and prosecutor both said parties should set a trial date. Although, Judge Kravitz noted, Bridges is not required to plead guilty, he said the prosecution has a right to resolve the case either through a plea or trial.

In response, Bridges said, “I’m not going to trial, sir. I’m asking for you to respect my moral rights.”

Judge Kravitz asked what Bridges meant by his “moral rights,” and Bridges repeated, “my moral rights.”

Shaw said he respectfully asked the judge and prosecutor if parties could set a date later in the week. According to Shaw, a PDS mental health specialist would meet with Bridges that week.

Judge Kravitz and the prosecutor agreed to Shaw’s request, but the judge said they will set a trial date if there is not a resolution at the next hearing.

The parties are scheduled to reconvene on Aug. 21.

Defendant Accepts Plea Deal for 2-Year-Old’s Death

A defendant accepted responsibility for his actions that caused the death of a two-year-old child in a hearing before DC Superior Court Judge Jason Park on Aug. 14.

Dasean Matthews, 27, was initially charged with first-degree felony murder with aggravating circumstances in that the victim was especially vulnerable due to age and that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel. In addition, Matthews was charged with three counts of first-degree cruelty to children.

The charges stemmed from Matthews involvement in the death of two-year-old Mars Jones on the unit block of Atlantic Street, SW, on Oct. 13, 2022. Mars succumbed to his injuries on Oct. 18, 2022.

Matthews’ charges faced an aggravating factor of allegedly being committed while he was on release for a prior offense.

Monet Jones, 28, Mars’ mother, is charged with second-degree cruelty to children for her alleged involvement in her son’s death. In addition Monet is charged with three counts of perjury for her alleged false testimony before a grand jury on Nov. 1, 2022, and obstruction of justice and tampering with physical evidence for her reported interference in the investigation.

At the hearing, Matthews accepted a plea deal from prosecutors that required him to plead guilty to second-degree murder while armed. In exchange, the prosecution dismissed all greater and remaining charges against the defendant.

As part of the deal, parties agreed to a sentence of 25 years in prison, subject to Judge Park’s approval at sentencing. Without the agreement, Matthews could have faced up to 40 years in prison for the charge he acknowledged.

If the case had proceeded to trial, prosecutors said the evidence would have proven that Matthews and Monet were in a romantic relationship at the time of the offense. Monet picked Matthews up from his residence and they drove with Mars to a Dunkin’ Donuts, where Matthews struck Mars with a close fist and caused him to fall against a metal railing. Matthews continued to harass Mars in the establishment.

The prosecutors said Monet then left Mars with Matthews at her residence, where Matthews grabbed Mars, struck him in the upper body or face, and he fell to the ground. Later, Matthews’ friend left him with Mars in a vehicle, where Matthews caused injuries to the victim.

Matthews actions left Mars unconscious and unresponsive with bruises to his face, neck, and extremities. Mars died as a result of complications from inflicted head trauma.

The prosecutor concluded that Matthews acted without legal justification.

Judge Park found a factual basis for the agreement and that Matthews knowingly and voluntarily pleaded guilty.

Matthews’ sentencing is scheduled for Feb. 1, 2027.

The prosecutors noted that they planned to extend a plea deal to Monet after the hearing. The parties for Monet are scheduled to reconvene on Sept. 18.

Search